TRN vs. STRL
TRN (Trinity Industries, Inc.) and STRL (Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — TRN in Railroads, STRL in Engineering & Construction. Over the past 10 years, TRN returned 10.19%/yr vs 58.67%/yr for STRL. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TRN vs. STRL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRN achieves a 21.61% return, which is significantly lower than STRL's 94.88% return. Over the past 10 years, TRN has underperformed STRL with an annualized return of 10.19%, while STRL has yielded a comparatively higher 58.67% annualized return.
TRN
- 1D
- -8.97%
- 1M
- -7.65%
- 6M
- 10.63%
- YTD
- 21.61%
- 1Y
- 34.52%
- 3Y*
- 11.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.45%
STRL
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -14.84%
- 6M
- 66.74%
- YTD
- 94.88%
- 1Y
- 126.87%
- 3Y*
- 111.61%
- 5Y*
- 93.57%
- 10Y*
- 58.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $512.00M | $493.44M | $636.07M | |
| $30.52M | $27.99M | $26.69M |
TRN vs. STRL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRN Trinity Industries, Inc. | 21.61% | -21.48% | 37.18% | -6.24% | 1.48% | 17.93% | 23.82% | 11.09% | -22.50% | 37.18% |
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 94.88% | 81.79% | 91.57% | 168.08% | 24.71% | 41.32% | 32.17% | 29.29% | -33.11% | 92.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRN and STRL is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995 | 0.27 |
The correlation between TRN and STRL shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TRN:
$2.48B
STRL:
$18.31B
TRN:
$4.20
STRL:
$11.16
TRN:
7.44
STRL:
53.46
TRN:
0.10
STRL:
1.14
TRN:
1.25
STRL:
6.42
TRN:
2.23
STRL:
15.57
TRN:
$2.04B
STRL:
$2.88B
TRN:
$531.90M
STRL:
$664.66M
TRN:
$1.04B
STRL:
$429.99M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRN vs. STRL — Risk / Return Rank
TRN
STRL
TRN vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN) and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRN | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.29 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 2.46 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.13 | 8.00 | -1.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRN vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRN drawdown since its inception was -86.22%, smaller than the maximum STRL drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRN and STRL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRN | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.22% | -92.51% | +6.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.94% | -50.26% | +32.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.58% | -50.26% | +10.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.58% | -50.26% | +10.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.21% | -59.60% | +14.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.94% | -39.95% | +22.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.59% | -46.20% | +14.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.45% | 15.44% | -8.99% |
Volatility
TRN vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN) is 15.65%, while Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) has a volatility of 31.97%. This indicates that TRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRN | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.65% | 31.97% | -16.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.83% | 71.75% | -42.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.29% | 88.81% | -52.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.75% | 58.94% | -23.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.63% | 54.66% | -18.03% |
Dividends
TRN vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison
TRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, while STRL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRN Trinity Industries, Inc. | 3.94% | 4.54% | 3.19% | 3.91% | 3.11% | 2.78% | 2.88% | 2.89% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.59% | 1.75% |
Financials
TRN vs. STRL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trinity Industries, Inc. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TRN vs. STRL - Profitability Comparison
TRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trinity Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 109.90M and revenue of 485.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.7%.
STRL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.
TRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trinity Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 58.80M and revenue of 485.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.
STRL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
TRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trinity Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 102.20M and revenue of 485.10M, resulting in a net margin of 21.1%.
STRL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TRN and STRL have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STRL has higher volatility (31.97%) compared to TRN (15.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRN dropped -86.22% vs STRL's -92.51%.
STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRN and STRL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer