PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRN vs. STRL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TRN vs. STRL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRN achieves a 23.04% return, which is significantly lower than STRL's 185.90% return. Over the past 10 years, TRN has underperformed STRL with an annualized return of 13.06%, while STRL has yielded a comparatively higher 66.97% annualized return.


TRN

1D
-0.13%
1M
-11.98%
YTD
23.04%
6M
22.62%
1Y
30.83%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
6.40%
10Y*
13.06%

STRL

1D
3.56%
1M
64.36%
YTD
185.90%
6M
167.11%
1Y
361.77%
3Y*
161.08%
5Y*
104.48%
10Y*
66.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRN vs. STRL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRN
Trinity Industries, Inc.
23.04%-21.48%37.18%-6.24%1.48%17.93%23.82%11.09%-22.50%37.18%
STRL
Sterling Construction Company, Inc.
185.90%81.79%91.57%168.08%24.71%41.32%32.17%29.29%-33.11%92.43%

Correlation

The correlation between TRN and STRL is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 1995

0.27

The correlation between TRN and STRL shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TRN:

$2.61B

STRL:

$27.17B

EPS

TRN:

$3.13

STRL:

$11.19

PE Ratio

TRN:

10.19

STRL:

78.25

PEG Ratio

TRN:

0.13

STRL:

1.67

PS Ratio

TRN:

1.27

STRL:

9.40

PB Ratio

TRN:

2.28

STRL:

22.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

TRN:

$2.06B

STRL:

$2.88B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TRN:

$559.40M

STRL:

$664.66M

EBITDA (TTM)

TRN:

$879.00M

STRL:

$429.99M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRN vs. STRL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRN
TRN Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRN Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRN Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

STRL
STRL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
STRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STRL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
STRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
STRL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRN vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRNSTRLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.91

4.55

-3.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.61

4.49

-2.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.60

-0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

11.79

-10.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.42

33.09

-28.67

TRN vs. STRL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRN Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the STRL Sharpe Ratio of 4.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRN and STRL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRNSTRLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

4.55

-3.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

1.86

-1.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

1.26

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.27

-0.07

Drawdowns

TRN vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRN drawdown since its inception was -86.22%, smaller than the maximum STRL drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRN and STRL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRNSTRLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.22%

-92.51%

+6.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.86%

-31.02%

+12.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.58%

-47.67%

+8.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.58%

-47.67%

+8.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.21%

-59.60%

+14.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.73%

-1.52%

-13.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.70%

-46.33%

+14.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.59%

11.05%

-4.46%

Volatility

TRN vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN) is 9.84%, while Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) has a volatility of 47.44%. This indicates that TRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRNSTRLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.84%

47.44%

-37.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.68%

62.52%

-35.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.94%

80.09%

-46.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.74%

56.62%

-20.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.78%

53.23%

-16.45%

Dividends

TRN vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison

TRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, while STRL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
STRL
Sterling Construction Company, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRN
Trinity Industries, Inc.
3.83%4.54%3.19%3.91%3.11%2.78%2.88%2.89%1.82%1.28%1.59%1.75%

Financials

TRN vs. STRL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trinity Industries, Inc. and Sterling Construction Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
492.00M
825.68M
(TRN) Total Revenue
(STRL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TRN vs. STRL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Trinity Industries, Inc. and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
26.2%
23.5%
Portfolio components
TRN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trinity Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 128.90M and revenue of 492.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.2%.

STRL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.

TRN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trinity Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 101.10M and revenue of 492.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.

STRL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

TRN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trinity Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 26.60M and revenue of 492.00M, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.

STRL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TRN and STRL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STRL has higher volatility (47.44%) compared to TRN (9.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRN dropped -86.22% vs STRL's -92.51%.

STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.55 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRN and STRL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer