TRN vs. MDU
TRN (Trinity Industries, Inc.) and MDU (MDU Resources Group, Inc.) are both stocks. TRN operates in Railroads (Industrials), while MDU operates in Building Materials (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, TRN returned 13.69%/yr vs 12.46%/yr for MDU. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TRN vs. MDU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRN achieves a 35.35% return, which is significantly higher than MDU's 12.09% return. Over the past 10 years, TRN has outperformed MDU with an annualized return of 13.69%, while MDU has yielded a comparatively lower 12.46% annualized return.
TRN
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 7.18%
- YTD
- 35.35%
- 6M
- 28.08%
- 1Y
- 39.85%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.14%
- 10Y*
- 13.69%
MDU
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 6M
- 11.92%
- 1Y
- 34.62%
- 3Y*
- 28.45%
- 5Y*
- 15.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.46%
TRN vs. MDU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRN Trinity Industries, Inc. | 35.35% | -21.48% | 37.18% | -6.24% | 1.48% | 17.93% | 23.82% | 11.09% | -22.50% | 37.18% |
MDU MDU Resources Group, Inc. | 12.09% | 11.77% | 68.01% | -1.94% | 1.46% | 20.37% | -8.31% | 28.44% | -8.64% | -3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRN and MDU is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1987 | 0.34 |
The correlation between TRN and MDU shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TRN:
$2.87B
MDU:
$4.47B
TRN:
$3.13
MDU:
$0.92
TRN:
11.21
MDU:
23.47
TRN:
1.40
MDU:
2.46
TRN:
2.51
MDU:
1.54
TRN:
$2.06B
MDU:
$1.81B
TRN:
$559.40M
MDU:
$848.35M
TRN:
$879.00M
MDU:
$528.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRN vs. MDU — Risk / Return Rank
TRN
MDU
TRN vs. MDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN) and MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRN | MDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.29 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 3.58 | -1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.86 | 7.55 | -1.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRN vs. MDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRN drawdown since its inception was -86.22%, which is greater than MDU's maximum drawdown of -62.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRN and MDU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRN | MDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.22% | -62.17% | -24.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.86% | -9.70% | -9.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.58% | -21.48% | -18.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.58% | -22.69% | -16.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.21% | -51.41% | +6.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.20% | -4.68% | -1.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.66% | -14.32% | -17.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.82% | 4.60% | +2.22% |
Volatility
TRN vs. MDU - Volatility Comparison
Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU) at 5.78%. This indicates that TRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRN | MDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.79% | 5.78% | +2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.95% | 14.31% | +12.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.03% | 21.67% | +12.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.42% | 23.00% | +12.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.71% | 27.12% | +9.59% |
Dividends
TRN vs. MDU - Dividend Comparison
TRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, more than MDU's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDU MDU Resources Group, Inc. | 2.59% | 2.77% | 1.89% | 3.16% | 2.88% | 2.77% | 3.17% | 2.74% | 3.33% | 2.88% | 2.62% | 4.01% |
TRN Trinity Industries, Inc. | 3.48% | 4.54% | 3.19% | 3.91% | 3.11% | 2.78% | 2.88% | 2.89% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.59% | 1.75% |
Financials
TRN vs. MDU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trinity Industries, Inc. and MDU Resources Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TRN vs. MDU - Profitability Comparison
TRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trinity Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 128.90M and revenue of 492.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.2%.
MDU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MDU Resources Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 491.20M and revenue of 606.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.1%.
TRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trinity Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 101.10M and revenue of 492.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.
MDU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MDU Resources Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 115.70M and revenue of 606.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.1%.
TRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trinity Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 26.60M and revenue of 492.00M, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.
MDU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MDU Resources Group, Inc. reported a net income of 80.80M and revenue of 606.00M, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TRN and MDU have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRN has higher volatility (7.79%) compared to MDU (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRN dropped -86.22% vs MDU's -62.17%.
MDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRN and MDU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer