TRN vs. MCK
TRN (Trinity Industries, Inc.) and MCK (McKesson Corporation) are both stocks. TRN operates in Railroads (Industrials), while MCK operates in Medical Distribution (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, TRN returned 10.12%/yr vs 16.50%/yr for MCK. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TRN vs. MCK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRN achieves a 24.72% return, which is significantly higher than MCK's 1.43% return. Over the past 10 years, TRN has underperformed MCK with an annualized return of 10.12%, while MCK has yielded a comparatively higher 16.50% annualized return.
TRN
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- -5.29%
- 6M
- 11.33%
- YTD
- 24.72%
- 1Y
- 35.39%
- 3Y*
- 12.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.52%
MCK
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- 6M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- 17.28%
- 3Y*
- 25.91%
- 5Y*
- 33.71%
- 10Y*
- 16.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $821.80M | $790.26M | $908.71M | |
| $32.62M | $27.54M | $26.96M |
TRN vs. MCK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRN Trinity Industries, Inc. | 24.72% | -21.48% | 37.18% | -6.24% | 1.48% | 17.93% | 23.82% | 11.09% | -22.50% | 37.18% |
MCK McKesson Corporation | 1.43% | 44.54% | 23.67% | 24.13% | 51.82% | 44.23% | 27.06% | 26.72% | -28.40% | 11.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRN and MCK is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 1994 | 0.25 |
The correlation between TRN and MCK shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (3 years) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TRN:
$2.55B
MCK:
$97.23B
TRN:
$4.20
MCK:
$38.53
TRN:
7.63
MCK:
21.55
TRN:
0.10
MCK:
0.29
TRN:
1.28
MCK:
0.25
TRN:
2.28
MCK:
14.73
TRN:
$2.04B
MCK:
$403.43B
TRN:
$531.90M
MCK:
$14.55B
TRN:
$1.04B
MCK:
$6.91B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRN vs. MCK — Risk / Return Rank
TRN
MCK
TRN vs. MCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN) and McKesson Corporation (MCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRN | MCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.14 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 0.64 | +1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.36 | 1.39 | +3.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRN vs. MCK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRN drawdown since its inception was -86.22%, roughly equal to the maximum MCK drawdown of -82.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRN and MCK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRN | MCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.22% | -82.84% | -3.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.94% | -27.17% | +9.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.58% | -27.17% | -12.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.58% | -27.17% | -12.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.21% | -43.71% | -1.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.84% | -16.51% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.59% | -28.60% | -2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.63% | 12.46% | -5.83% |
Volatility
TRN vs. MCK - Volatility Comparison
Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN) has a higher volatility of 15.15% compared to McKesson Corporation (MCK) at 10.59%. This indicates that TRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRN | MCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.15% | 10.59% | +4.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.87% | 25.23% | +3.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.52% | 30.79% | +4.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.73% | 24.63% | +11.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.64% | 28.97% | +7.67% |
Dividends
TRN vs. MCK - Dividend Comparison
TRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than MCK's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCK McKesson Corporation | 0.39% | 0.37% | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.54% | 0.72% | 0.95% | 1.16% | 1.32% | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.53% |
TRN Trinity Industries, Inc. | 3.84% | 4.54% | 3.19% | 3.91% | 3.11% | 2.78% | 2.88% | 2.89% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.59% | 1.75% |
Financials
TRN vs. MCK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trinity Industries, Inc. and McKesson Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TRN vs. MCK - Profitability Comparison
TRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trinity Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 109.90M and revenue of 485.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.7%.
MCK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, McKesson Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.04B and revenue of 96.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.2%.
TRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trinity Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 58.80M and revenue of 485.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.
MCK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, McKesson Corporation reported an operating income of 2.09B and revenue of 96.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.
TRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trinity Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 102.20M and revenue of 485.10M, resulting in a net margin of 21.1%.
MCK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, McKesson Corporation reported a net income of 1.68B and revenue of 96.30B, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TRN and MCK have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRN has higher volatility (15.15%) compared to MCK (10.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRN dropped -86.22% vs MCK's -82.84%.
TRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRN and MCK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer