PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TRML vs. TRAK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


TRMLTRAK
YTD Return-19.79%92.62%
1Y Return61.91%126.77%
3Y Return (Ann)-30.64%53.85%
Sharpe Ratio0.713.20
Daily Std Dev87.59%39.28%
Max Drawdown-94.97%-99.70%
Current Drawdown-74.60%-89.23%

Fundamentals


TRMLTRAK
Market Cap$495.90M$350.63M
EPS-$1.92$0.28
Total Revenue (TTM)$2.28M$15.27M
Gross Profit (TTM)$880.00K$11.80M
EBITDA (TTM)-$54.49M$4.65M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between TRML and TRAK is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

TRML vs. TRAK - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, TRML achieves a -19.79% return, which is significantly lower than TRAK's 92.62% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-53.00%
28.97%
TRML
TRAK

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TRML vs. TRAK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tourmaline Bio Inc. (TRML) and Park City Group Inc (TRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRML
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TRML, currently valued at 0.71, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.71
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TRML, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.44
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TRML, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.21
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TRML, currently valued at 0.70, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.000.70
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TRML, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.001.35
TRAK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TRAK, currently valued at 3.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.003.20
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TRAK, currently valued at 3.78, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.78
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TRAK, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.46
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TRAK, currently valued at 7.50, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.007.50
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TRAK, currently valued at 20.23, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0020.23

TRML vs. TRAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRML Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the TRAK Sharpe Ratio of 3.20. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of TRML and TRAK.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.006.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
0.71
3.20
TRML
TRAK

Dividends

TRML vs. TRAK - Dividend Comparison

TRML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 71.99%, more than TRAK's 0.34% yield.


TTM20232022
TRML
Tourmaline Bio Inc.
71.99%57.75%0.00%
TRAK
Park City Group Inc
0.34%0.76%0.30%

Drawdowns

TRML vs. TRAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRML drawdown since its inception was -94.97%, roughly equal to the maximum TRAK drawdown of -99.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRML and TRAK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-74.60%
-2.98%
TRML
TRAK

Volatility

TRML vs. TRAK - Volatility Comparison

Tourmaline Bio Inc. (TRML) has a higher volatility of 24.57% compared to Park City Group Inc (TRAK) at 9.72%. This indicates that TRML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
24.57%
9.72%
TRML
TRAK

Financials

TRML vs. TRAK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tourmaline Bio Inc. and Park City Group Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items