PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TRML vs. EME
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


TRMLEME
YTD Return9.85%139.32%
1Y Return77.64%146.57%
3Y Return (Ann)-26.32%58.32%
Sharpe Ratio1.054.84
Sortino Ratio1.654.91
Omega Ratio1.251.75
Calmar Ratio1.0110.16
Martin Ratio1.7732.57
Ulcer Index48.45%4.55%
Daily Std Dev81.53%30.65%
Max Drawdown-94.97%-70.56%
Current Drawdown-65.21%0.00%

Fundamentals


TRMLEME
Market Cap$709.24M$23.65B
EPS-$1.92$20.05
Total Revenue (TTM)$2.28M$14.24B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.12M$2.63B
EBITDA (TTM)-$45.79M$1.34B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between TRML and EME is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

TRML vs. EME - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, TRML achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly lower than EME's 139.32% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
98.31%
35.37%
TRML
EME

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TRML vs. EME - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tourmaline Bio Inc. (TRML) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRML
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TRML, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.05
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TRML, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.65
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TRML, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.25
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TRML, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.01
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TRML, currently valued at 1.77, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.77
EME
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EME, currently valued at 4.84, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.004.84
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EME, currently valued at 4.91, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.91
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EME, currently valued at 1.75, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.75
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EME, currently valued at 10.16, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.0010.16
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EME, currently valued at 32.57, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0032.57

TRML vs. EME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRML Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the EME Sharpe Ratio of 4.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRML and EME, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.006.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.05
4.84
TRML
EME

Dividends

TRML vs. EME - Dividend Comparison

TRML has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
TRML
Tourmaline Bio Inc.
0.00%57.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
0.18%0.32%0.36%0.41%0.35%0.37%0.54%0.39%0.45%0.67%0.72%0.42%

Drawdowns

TRML vs. EME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRML drawdown since its inception was -94.97%, which is greater than EME's maximum drawdown of -70.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRML and EME. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-65.21%
0
TRML
EME

Volatility

TRML vs. EME - Volatility Comparison

Tourmaline Bio Inc. (TRML) has a higher volatility of 16.38% compared to EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) at 9.07%. This indicates that TRML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.38%
9.07%
TRML
EME

Financials

TRML vs. EME - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tourmaline Bio Inc. and EMCOR Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items