TRMD vs. MLPR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about TORM plc (TRMD) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR).

MLPR is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian MLP Index (150%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2020.

Performance

TRMD vs. MLPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TORM plc (TRMD) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TRMD vs. MLPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TRMD TORM plc	46.25%	11.21%	-23.37%	31.64%	297.66%	12.91%	-2.43%
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN	24.29%	9.83%	31.57%	35.87%	41.04%	57.33%	-9.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRMD achieves a 46.25% return, which is significantly higher than MLPR's 24.29% return.

TRMD

• 1D: 1.90%
• 1M: -4.96%
• YTD: 46.25%
• 6M: 42.74%
• 1Y: 86.19%
• 3Y*: 12.45%
• 5Y*: 41.12%
• 10Y*: —

MLPR

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: 1.32%
• YTD: 24.29%
• 6M: 30.59%
• 1Y: 15.78%
• 3Y*: 32.28%
• 5Y*: 32.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TRMD vs. MLPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRMD

TRMD Risk / Return Rank: 90
TRMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
TRMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
TRMD Omega Ratio Rank: 86
TRMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
TRMD Martin Ratio Rank: 91

MLPR

MLPR Risk / Return Rank: 30
MLPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
MLPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
MLPR Omega Ratio Rank: 34
MLPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
MLPR Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRMD vs. MLPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TORM plc (TRMD) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRMD	MLPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	0.57	+1.63
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	0.86	+1.95
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.13	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.20	0.62	+3.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.02	1.44	+9.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRMD vs. MLPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRMD Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the MLPR Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRMD and MLPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRMD	MLPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	0.57	+1.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	1.09	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.93	-0.45

Correlation

The correlation between TRMD and MLPR is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TRMD vs. MLPR - Dividend Comparison

TRMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.60%, less than MLPR's 9.14% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TRMD TORM plc	7.60%	10.32%	30.13%	23.05%	6.99%	0.00%	14.89%
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN	9.14%	10.85%	9.57%	10.08%	7.49%	10.69%	4.21%

Drawdowns

TRMD vs. MLPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRMD drawdown since its inception was -60.59%, which is greater than MLPR's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMD and MLPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRMD	MLPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.59%	-48.98%	-11.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.49%	-24.45%	+4.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.59%	-28.66%	-31.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.44%	-4.17%	-9.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.91%	-9.09%	-13.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.43%	10.53%	-3.10%

Volatility

TRMD vs. MLPR - Volatility Comparison

TORM plc (TRMD) has a higher volatility of 14.99% compared to ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) at 4.93%. This indicates that TRMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRMD	MLPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.99%	4.93%	+10.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.39%	14.06%	+12.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.54%	28.04%	+11.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.89%	29.60%	+16.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.26%	34.01%	+26.25%