TRMB vs. GGG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Trimble Inc. (TRMB) and Graco Inc. (GGG).

Performance

TRMB vs. GGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trimble Inc. (TRMB) and Graco Inc. (GGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TRMB vs. GGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TRMB Trimble Inc.	-16.94%	10.88%	32.82%	5.22%	-42.01%	30.58%	60.16%	26.68%	-19.02%	34.79%
GGG Graco Inc.	4.84%	-1.46%	-1.68%	30.62%	-15.48%	12.56%	40.97%	25.94%	-6.34%	65.60%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TRMB : $15.61B GGG : $14.40B
EPS TRMB : $1.76 GGG : $3.10
PE Ratio TRMB : 37.07 GGG : 27.64
PEG Ratio TRMB : 0.53 GGG : 5.43
PS Ratio TRMB : 4.38 GGG : 6.45
PB Ratio TRMB : 2.67 GGG : 5.43
Total Revenue (TTM) TRMB : $3.59B GGG : $2.24B
Gross Profit (TTM) TRMB : $2.45B GGG : $1.17B
EBITDA (TTM) TRMB : $789.50M GGG : $714.54M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRMB achieves a -16.94% return, which is significantly lower than GGG's 4.84% return. Over the past 10 years, TRMB has underperformed GGG with an annualized return of 10.02%, while GGG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.02% annualized return.

TRMB

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -4.87%
• YTD: -16.94%
• 6M: -18.05%
• 1Y: -0.46%
• 3Y*: 7.48%
• 5Y*: -4.22%
• 10Y*: 10.02%

GGG

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: -9.67%
• YTD: 4.84%
• 6M: 2.01%
• 1Y: 2.88%
• 3Y*: 6.80%
• 5Y*: 4.56%
• 10Y*: 13.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TRMB vs. GGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRMB

TRMB Risk / Return Rank: 37
TRMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
TRMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
TRMB Omega Ratio Rank: 33
TRMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
TRMB Martin Ratio Rank: 39

GGG

GGG Risk / Return Rank: 43
GGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
GGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
GGG Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
GGG Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRMB vs. GGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trimble Inc. (TRMB) and Graco Inc. (GGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRMB	GGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.01	0.13	-0.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.20	0.34	-0.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.04	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.03	0.31	-0.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.08	0.73	-0.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRMB vs. GGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRMB Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the GGG Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRMB and GGG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRMB	GGG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01	0.13	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13	0.20	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	0.53	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.44	-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between TRMB and GGG is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TRMB vs. GGG - Dividend Comparison

TRMB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TRMB Trimble Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GGG Graco Inc.	1.31%	1.34%	1.21%	1.08%	1.25%	0.93%	0.97%	1.23%	1.27%	1.06%	1.59%	1.67%

Drawdowns

TRMB vs. GGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRMB drawdown since its inception was -87.23%, which is greater than GGG's maximum drawdown of -68.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMB and GGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRMB	GGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.23%	-68.77%	-18.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.63%	-12.55%	-14.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.35%	-28.98%	-28.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.35%	-30.60%	-26.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.01%	-9.67%	-22.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.35%	-12.08%	-19.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.93%	5.36%	+5.57%

Volatility

TRMB vs. GGG - Volatility Comparison

Trimble Inc. (TRMB) has a higher volatility of 8.39% compared to Graco Inc. (GGG) at 5.93%. This indicates that TRMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRMB	GGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.39%	5.93%	+2.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.06%	13.48%	+8.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.29%	21.55%	+10.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.65%	22.50%	+10.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.45%	24.75%	+8.70%

Financials

TRMB vs. GGG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Trimble Inc. and Graco Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TRMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Trimble Inc. reported a gross profit of 698.10M and revenue of 969.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.0%.

GGG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Graco Inc. reported a gross profit of 306.70M and revenue of 593.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.7%.

TRMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Trimble Inc. reported an operating income of 216.20M and revenue of 969.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.3%.

GGG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Graco Inc. reported an operating income of 172.64M and revenue of 593.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.1%.

TRMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Trimble Inc. reported a net income of 156.60M and revenue of 969.80M, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.

GGG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Graco Inc. reported a net income of 132.49M and revenue of 593.16M, resulting in a net margin of 22.3%.