PortfoliosLab logo
TRMB vs. CF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between TRMB and CF is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

TRMB vs. CF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trimble Inc. (TRMB) and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TRMB:

0.58

CF:

0.44

Sortino Ratio

TRMB:

1.13

CF:

0.72

Omega Ratio

TRMB:

1.15

CF:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

TRMB:

0.41

CF:

0.32

Martin Ratio

TRMB:

2.18

CF:

1.12

Ulcer Index

TRMB:

8.94%

CF:

11.36%

Daily Std Dev

TRMB:

34.39%

CF:

31.55%

Max Drawdown

TRMB:

-87.23%

CF:

-76.73%

Current Drawdown

TRMB:

-28.83%

CF:

-26.37%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TRMB:

$16.25B

CF:

$13.72B

EPS

TRMB:

$6.13

CF:

$6.74

PE Ratio

TRMB:

11.11

CF:

12.23

PEG Ratio

TRMB:

2.39

CF:

0.71

PS Ratio

TRMB:

4.41

CF:

2.31

PB Ratio

TRMB:

2.97

CF:

2.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

TRMB:

$3.61B

CF:

$4.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TRMB:

$2.37B

CF:

$1.65B

EBITDA (TTM)

TRMB:

$579.10M

CF:

$2.19B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRMB achieves a -3.59% return, which is significantly lower than CF's -2.81% return. Over the past 10 years, TRMB has outperformed CF with an annualized return of 10.67%, while CF has yielded a comparatively lower 5.97% annualized return.


TRMB

YTD

-3.59%

1M

17.37%

6M

-6.24%

1Y

19.93%

5Y*

12.96%

10Y*

10.67%

CF

YTD

-2.81%

1M

17.78%

6M

-0.36%

1Y

14.26%

5Y*

27.76%

10Y*

5.97%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TRMB vs. CF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRMB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TRMB is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TRMB is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TRMB is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TRMB is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TRMB is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TRMB is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

CF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CF is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CF is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CF is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CF is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CF is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CF is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TRMB vs. CF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trimble Inc. (TRMB) and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TRMB Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is higher than the CF Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRMB and CF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

TRMB vs. CF - Dividend Comparison

TRMB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TRMB
Trimble Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CF
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
2.43%2.34%2.01%1.76%1.70%3.10%2.51%2.76%2.82%3.81%2.94%1.83%

Drawdowns

TRMB vs. CF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRMB drawdown since its inception was -87.23%, which is greater than CF's maximum drawdown of -76.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMB and CF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

TRMB vs. CF - Volatility Comparison

Trimble Inc. (TRMB) has a higher volatility of 11.13% compared to CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) at 5.00%. This indicates that TRMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

TRMB vs. CF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trimble Inc. and CF Industries Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20212022202320242025
983.40M
1.52B
(TRMB) Total Revenue
(CF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TRMB vs. CF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Trimble Inc. and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
71.2%
34.4%
(TRMB) Gross Margin
(CF) Gross Margin
TRMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Trimble Inc. reported a gross profit of 700.50M and revenue of 983.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.2%.

CF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 524.00M and revenue of 1.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.4%.

TRMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Trimble Inc. reported an operating income of 173.50M and revenue of 983.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

CF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 441.00M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.9%.

TRMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Trimble Inc. reported a net income of 90.20M and revenue of 983.40M, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.

CF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 328.00M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in a net margin of 21.5%.