PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRLGX vs. PRBLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRLGX vs. PRBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) and Parnassus Core Equity Fund (PRBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRLGX achieves a 5.12% return, which is significantly lower than PRBLX's 6.73% return. Over the past 10 years, TRLGX has outperformed PRBLX with an annualized return of 18.44%, while PRBLX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.62% annualized return.


TRLGX

1D
-0.90%
1M
5.03%
YTD
5.12%
6M
4.79%
1Y
20.79%
3Y*
25.39%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
18.44%

PRBLX

1D
0.10%
1M
4.10%
YTD
6.73%
6M
5.90%
1Y
15.02%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
13.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRLGX vs. PRBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
5.12%17.51%37.57%46.22%-35.26%23.24%39.57%28.51%4.35%37.77%
PRBLX
Parnassus Core Equity Fund
6.73%11.67%18.58%24.97%-18.64%27.59%21.21%30.68%-0.30%16.63%

Correlation

The correlation between TRLGX and PRBLX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2001

0.89

The correlation between TRLGX and PRBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRLGX vs. PRBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRLGX
TRLGX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TRLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
TRLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

PRBLX
PRBLX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PRBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PRBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRLGX vs. PRBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) and Parnassus Core Equity Fund (PRBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRLGXPRBLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.24

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

1.37

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.75

5.35

-1.60

TRLGX vs. PRBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRLGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the PRBLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRLGX and PRBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRLGXPRBLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.36

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.64

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.79

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.71

-0.13

Drawdowns

TRLGX vs. PRBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRLGX drawdown since its inception was -55.56%, which is greater than PRBLX's maximum drawdown of -42.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRLGX and PRBLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRLGXPRBLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.56%

-42.20%

-13.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.18%

-11.63%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.17%

-16.31%

-4.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.44%

-26.31%

-14.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.44%

-30.09%

-10.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

0.00%

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.68%

-4.05%

-4.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.72%

2.97%

+2.75%

Volatility

TRLGX vs. PRBLX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to Parnassus Core Equity Fund (PRBLX) at 3.03%. This indicates that TRLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRLGXPRBLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

3.03%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.35%

9.12%

+3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.59%

11.78%

+3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.38%

16.25%

+6.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.76%

17.27%

+4.49%

TRLGX vs. PRBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRLGX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PRBLX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRLGX vs. PRBLX - Dividend Comparison

TRLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.02%, less than PRBLX's 17.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRBLX
Parnassus Core Equity Fund
17.83%19.08%10.00%6.01%10.13%7.77%5.87%8.02%9.64%7.16%3.80%9.62%
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
13.02%13.69%9.80%2.04%3.88%2.56%0.42%4.09%7.93%9.27%1.64%4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRLGX and PRBLX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRLGX has higher volatility (3.27%) compared to PRBLX (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRLGX dropped -55.56% vs PRBLX's -42.20%.

TRLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRLGX and PRBLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer