PortfoliosLab logo
TRLGX vs. AEMGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TRLGX and AEMGX is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.6

Performance

TRLGX vs. AEMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) and Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio (AEMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1,111.68%
305.58%
TRLGX
AEMGX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TRLGX:

0.47

AEMGX:

0.53

Sortino Ratio

TRLGX:

0.82

AEMGX:

0.82

Omega Ratio

TRLGX:

1.12

AEMGX:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

TRLGX:

0.52

AEMGX:

0.28

Martin Ratio

TRLGX:

1.96

AEMGX:

1.89

Ulcer Index

TRLGX:

5.66%

AEMGX:

4.76%

Daily Std Dev

TRLGX:

23.44%

AEMGX:

16.83%

Max Drawdown

TRLGX:

-55.56%

AEMGX:

-81.31%

Current Drawdown

TRLGX:

-10.96%

AEMGX:

-23.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRLGX achieves a -6.99% return, which is significantly lower than AEMGX's 0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, TRLGX has outperformed AEMGX with an annualized return of 14.93%, while AEMGX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.87% annualized return.


TRLGX

YTD

-6.99%

1M

-2.20%

6M

-4.16%

1Y

12.43%

5Y*

15.52%

10Y*

14.93%

AEMGX

YTD

0.18%

1M

-2.70%

6M

-2.92%

1Y

8.44%

5Y*

10.86%

10Y*

3.87%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TRLGX vs. AEMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRLGX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than AEMGX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for AEMGX: current value is 1.49%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
AEMGX: 1.49%
Expense ratio chart for TRLGX: current value is 0.55%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
TRLGX: 0.55%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TRLGX vs. AEMGX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRLGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TRLGX is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TRLGX is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TRLGX is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TRLGX is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TRLGX is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TRLGX is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

AEMGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AEMGX is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AEMGX is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AEMGX is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AEMGX is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AEMGX is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AEMGX is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TRLGX vs. AEMGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) and Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio (AEMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for TRLGX, currently valued at 0.47, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.00
TRLGX: 0.47
AEMGX: 0.53
The chart of Sortino ratio for TRLGX, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
TRLGX: 0.82
AEMGX: 0.82
The chart of Omega ratio for TRLGX, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
TRLGX: 1.12
AEMGX: 1.11
The chart of Calmar ratio for TRLGX, currently valued at 0.52, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
TRLGX: 0.52
AEMGX: 0.28
The chart of Martin ratio for TRLGX, currently valued at 1.96, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.00
TRLGX: 1.96
AEMGX: 1.89

The current TRLGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is comparable to the AEMGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRLGX and AEMGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.47
0.53
TRLGX
AEMGX

Dividends

TRLGX vs. AEMGX - Dividend Comparison

TRLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, more than AEMGX's 2.81% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
5.27%4.90%2.04%3.88%2.56%0.42%7.76%7.93%9.27%1.64%4.71%7.64%
AEMGX
Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio
2.81%2.82%3.85%6.16%2.99%1.29%1.78%1.82%1.30%2.01%1.27%1.16%

Drawdowns

TRLGX vs. AEMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRLGX drawdown since its inception was -55.56%, smaller than the maximum AEMGX drawdown of -81.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRLGX and AEMGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-10.96%
-23.16%
TRLGX
AEMGX

Volatility

TRLGX vs. AEMGX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) has a higher volatility of 16.23% compared to Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio (AEMGX) at 9.75%. This indicates that TRLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
16.23%
9.75%
TRLGX
AEMGX