PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
TRLGX vs. AEMGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

TRLGX vs. AEMGX

Last updated May 12, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) and Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio (AEMGX).

TRLGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Oct 31, 2001. AEMGX is managed by Acadian Funds. It was launched on Jun 16, 1993.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TRLGX or AEMGX.

Correlation

The correlation between TRLGX and AEMGX is -0.60. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Performance

TRLGX vs. AEMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) and Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio (AEMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

TRLGX:

11.57%

AEMGX:

5.29%

Max Drawdown

TRLGX:

-0.82%

AEMGX:

-0.55%

Current Drawdown

TRLGX:

-0.38%

AEMGX:

-0.17%

Returns By Period

TRLGX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

AEMGX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

TRLGX vs. AEMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRLGX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than AEMGX's 1.49% expense ratio.

AEMGX
Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TRLGX vs. AEMGX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TRLGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TRLGX is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TRLGX is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TRLGX is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TRLGX is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TRLGX is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TRLGX is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
AEMGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AEMGX is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AEMGX is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AEMGX is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AEMGX is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AEMGX is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AEMGX is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TRLGX vs. AEMGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) and Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio (AEMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

No data
No data
No data
No data
No data

Loading data...

Dividends

TRLGX vs. AEMGX - Dividend Comparison

TRLGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AEMGX
Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio		2.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TRLGX vs. AEMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRLGX drawdown since its inception was -0.82%, which is greater than AEMGX's maximum drawdown of -0.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRLGX and AEMGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

TRLGX vs. AEMGX - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...