PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRIN vs. UTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TRIN vs. UTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) and Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRIN achieves a 23.86% return, which is significantly higher than UTG's 16.36% return.


TRIN

1D
1.78%
1M
2.31%
YTD
23.86%
6M
26.92%
1Y
38.78%
3Y*
27.60%
5Y*
19.01%
10Y*

UTG

1D
-0.41%
1M
-3.43%
YTD
16.36%
6M
14.22%
1Y
27.80%
3Y*
24.23%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
10.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRIN vs. UTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TRIN
Trinity Capital Inc.
23.86%16.01%14.83%53.97%-26.60%27.12%
UTG
Reaves Utility Income Trust
16.36%23.24%28.10%2.84%-13.38%15.21%

Correlation

The correlation between TRIN and UTG is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2021

0.27

The correlation between TRIN and UTG shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.30 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TRIN:

$1.44B

UTG:

$3.75B

EPS

TRIN:

$2.07

UTG:

$18.20

PE Ratio

TRIN:

8.32

UTG:

2.29

PS Ratio

TRIN:

4.64

UTG:

7.14

PB Ratio

TRIN:

1.23

UTG:

1.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

TRIN:

$276.05M

UTG:

$525.39M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TRIN:

$219.75M

UTG:

$228.88M

EBITDA (TTM)

TRIN:

$195.35M

UTG:

$1.71B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRIN vs. UTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRIN
TRIN Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TRIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRIN Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
TRIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRIN Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

UTG
UTG Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
UTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTG Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
UTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTG Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRIN vs. UTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) and Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRINUTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.29

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.41

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.53

5.37

+1.16

TRIN vs. UTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRIN Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the UTG Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRIN and UTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRINUTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

1.68

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.68

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.48

+0.17

Drawdowns

TRIN vs. UTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRIN drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum UTG drawdown of -67.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIN and UTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRINUTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-67.77%

+24.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.99%

-11.59%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

-15.03%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.12%

-26.54%

-16.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-3.92%

+3.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.94%

-8.74%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.95%

5.19%

+0.76%

Volatility

TRIN vs. UTG - Volatility Comparison

Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG) at 6.01%. This indicates that TRIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRINUTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.65%

6.01%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.55%

12.72%

+2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.07%

16.66%

+3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.59%

16.81%

+9.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.82%

21.59%

+5.23%

Dividends

TRIN vs. UTG - Dividend Comparison

TRIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.85%, more than UTG's 5.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TRIN
Trinity Capital Inc.
13.85%13.92%14.10%14.04%21.32%7.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTG
Reaves Utility Income Trust
5.72%6.42%7.19%8.53%8.07%6.35%6.59%5.69%6.86%6.21%9.02%6.86%

Financials

TRIN vs. UTG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trinity Capital Inc. and Reaves Utility Income Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
83.32M
76.73M
(TRIN) Total Revenue
(UTG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TRIN and UTG have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRIN has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to UTG (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRIN dropped -43.12% vs UTG's -67.77%.

TRIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRIN and UTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer