TRIN vs. CE

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) and Celanese Corporation (CE).

Performance

TRIN vs. CE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) and Celanese Corporation (CE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TRIN vs. CE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TRIN Trinity Capital Inc.	3.79%	16.01%	14.83%	53.97%	-26.60%	27.12%
CE Celanese Corporation	55.65%	-38.76%	-54.57%	55.69%	-37.77%	40.15%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TRIN : $1.13B CE : $7.22B
EPS TRIN : $1.91 CE : -$10.57
PS Ratio TRIN : 3.76 CE : 0.76
PB Ratio TRIN : 1.04 CE : 1.78
Total Revenue (TTM) TRIN : $279.97M CE : $9.54B
Gross Profit (TTM) TRIN : $228.11M CE : $1.92B
EBITDA (TTM) TRIN : $98.03M CE : $193.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRIN achieves a 3.79% return, which is significantly lower than CE's 55.65% return.

TRIN

• 1D: 2.37%
• 1M: 0.62%
• YTD: 3.79%
• 6M: 1.68%
• 1Y: 11.23%
• 3Y*: 20.83%
• 5Y*: 14.96%
• 10Y*: —

CE

• 1D: 2.37%
• 1M: 31.70%
• YTD: 55.65%
• 6M: 56.49%
• 1Y: 16.14%
• 3Y*: -14.30%
• 5Y*: -14.00%
• 10Y*: 1.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TRIN vs. CE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRIN

TRIN Risk / Return Rank: 56
TRIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
TRIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
TRIN Omega Ratio Rank: 51
TRIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
TRIN Martin Ratio Rank: 57

CE

CE Risk / Return Rank: 51
CE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
CE Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CE Omega Ratio Rank: 50
CE Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
CE Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRIN vs. CE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) and Celanese Corporation (CE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRIN	CE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	0.25	+0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.82	0.82	-0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.10	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.67	0.36	+0.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.50	0.63	+0.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRIN vs. CE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRIN Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is higher than the CE Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRIN and CE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRIN	CE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50	0.25	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	-0.32	+0.89
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.20	+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between TRIN and CE is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TRIN vs. CE - Dividend Comparison

TRIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.87%, more than CE's 0.18% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TRIN Trinity Capital Inc.	13.87%	13.92%	14.10%	14.04%	21.32%	7.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CE Celanese Corporation	0.18%	0.28%	4.05%	1.80%	2.68%	1.62%	1.91%	1.95%	2.31%	1.62%	1.75%	1.71%

Drawdowns

TRIN vs. CE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRIN drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum CE drawdown of -84.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIN and CE.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRIN	CE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.12%	-84.87%	+41.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.99%	-42.98%	+27.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.12%	-78.96%	+35.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-78.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.81%	-61.03%	+49.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.13%	-20.27%	+11.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.72%	24.42%	-17.70%

Volatility

TRIN vs. CE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) is 6.07%, while Celanese Corporation (CE) has a volatility of 21.32%. This indicates that TRIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRIN	CE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.07%	21.32%	-15.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.76%	41.02%	-25.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.69%	63.73%	-41.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.36%	44.12%	-17.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.95%	38.60%	-11.65%

Financials