TRIN vs. CE
TRIN (Trinity Capital Inc.) and CE (Celanese Corporation) are both stocks. TRIN operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while CE operates in Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, TRIN returned 20.45%/yr vs -18.40%/yr for CE. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TRIN vs. CE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRIN achieves a 30.46% return, which is significantly higher than CE's 17.74% return.
TRIN
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 9.80%
- YTD
- 30.46%
- 6M
- 30.59%
- 1Y
- 48.53%
- 3Y*
- 28.19%
- 5Y*
- 20.45%
- 10Y*
- —
CE
- 1D
- -2.80%
- 1M
- -5.08%
- YTD
- 17.74%
- 6M
- 16.53%
- 1Y
- -6.86%
- 3Y*
- -22.23%
- 5Y*
- -18.40%
- 10Y*
- -0.90%
TRIN vs. CE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRIN Trinity Capital Inc. | 30.46% | 16.01% | 14.83% | 53.97% | -26.60% | 36.20% |
CE Celanese Corporation | 17.74% | -38.76% | -54.57% | 55.69% | -37.77% | 40.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRIN and CE is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
TRIN:
$1.41B
CE:
$5.47B
TRIN:
$2.07
CE:
-$9.33
TRIN:
4.56
CE:
0.58
TRIN:
1.21
CE:
1.35
TRIN:
$276.05M
CE:
$9.49B
TRIN:
$219.75M
CE:
$1.91B
TRIN:
$195.35M
CE:
$148.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRIN vs. CE — Risk / Return Rank
TRIN
CE
TRIN vs. CE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) and Celanese Corporation (CE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRIN | CE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.03 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | -0.16 | +3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.19 | -0.28 | +8.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRIN vs. CE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRIN drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum CE drawdown of -84.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIN and CE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRIN | CE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.12% | -84.87% | +41.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.99% | -42.98% | +27.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.58% | -78.96% | +63.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.12% | -78.96% | +35.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -78.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -70.52% | +70.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.87% | -20.74% | +11.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.95% | 24.29% | -18.34% |
Volatility
TRIN vs. CE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) is 8.16%, while Celanese Corporation (CE) has a volatility of 11.53%. This indicates that TRIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRIN | CE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.16% | 11.53% | -3.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.50% | 39.86% | -23.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.12% | 56.25% | -35.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.76% | 45.19% | -18.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.03% | 39.29% | -12.26% |
Dividends
TRIN vs. CE - Dividend Comparison
TRIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.94%, more than CE's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CE Celanese Corporation | 0.24% | 0.28% | 4.05% | 1.80% | 2.68% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.95% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 1.75% | 1.71% |
TRIN Trinity Capital Inc. | 20.94% | 13.92% | 14.10% | 14.04% | 21.32% | 7.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TRIN vs. CE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trinity Capital Inc. and Celanese Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TRIN vs. CE - Profitability Comparison
TRIN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trinity Capital Inc. reported a gross profit of 66.05M and revenue of 83.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.3%.
CE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celanese Corporation reported a gross profit of 468.00M and revenue of 2.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.
TRIN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trinity Capital Inc. reported an operating income of 61.68M and revenue of 83.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 74.0%.
CE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celanese Corporation reported an operating income of 214.00M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.
TRIN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trinity Capital Inc. reported a net income of 45.52M and revenue of 83.32M, resulting in a net margin of 54.6%.
CE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celanese Corporation reported a net income of 115.00M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in a net margin of 4.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TRIN and CE have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CE has higher volatility (11.53%) compared to TRIN (8.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRIN dropped -43.12% vs CE's -84.87%.
TRIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRIN and CE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer