PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TREX vs. FND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TREX vs. FND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TREX achieves a 18.56% return, which is significantly higher than FND's -16.97% return.


TREX

1D
0.07%
1M
7.22%
YTD
18.56%
6M
19.34%
1Y
-22.36%
3Y*
-9.38%
5Y*
-15.17%
10Y*
14.44%

FND

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
-16.97%
6M
-21.53%
1Y
-27.86%
3Y*
-18.72%
5Y*
-12.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TREX vs. FND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TREX
Trex Company, Inc.
18.56%-49.18%-16.62%95.58%-68.65%61.29%86.29%51.42%9.53%44.93%
FND
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.
-16.97%-38.93%-10.63%60.22%-46.44%40.02%82.74%96.18%-46.80%51.89%

Correlation

The correlation between TREX and FND is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2017

0.54

The correlation between TREX and FND shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

TREX:

$1.80

FND:

$2.45

PE Ratio

TREX:

23.16

FND:

20.61

PS Ratio

TREX:

3.76

FND:

0.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

TREX:

$1.18B

FND:

$4.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TREX:

$461.26M

FND:

$1.93B

EBITDA (TTM)

TREX:

$308.51M

FND:

$439.17M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TREX vs. FND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TREX
TREX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
TREX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TREX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
TREX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
TREX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TREX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FND
FND Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FND Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FND Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FND Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FND Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TREX vs. FND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TREXFNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.45

-0.61

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.29

-0.71

+0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.93

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

-0.57

+0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.73

-1.06

+0.32

TREX vs. FND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TREX Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is comparable to the FND Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TREX and FND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TREXFNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.45

-0.61

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.32

-0.27

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.11

+0.14

Drawdowns

TREX vs. FND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TREX drawdown since its inception was -90.53%, which is greater than FND's maximum drawdown of -69.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TREX and FND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TREXFNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.53%

-69.65%

-20.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.01%

-51.90%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.90%

-67.48%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.58%

-69.65%

-8.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.44%

-64.72%

-5.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.73%

-27.13%

-11.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.95%

27.92%

+7.03%

Volatility

TREX vs. FND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) is 14.37%, while Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) has a volatility of 15.29%. This indicates that TREX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TREXFNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.37%

15.29%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.83%

33.03%

-7.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.09%

45.86%

+4.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.05%

45.75%

+1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.33%

48.57%

-2.24%

Dividends

TREX vs. FND - Dividend Comparison

Neither TREX nor FND has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

TREX vs. FND - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trex Company, Inc. and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
343.40M
1.15B
(TREX) Total Revenue
(FND) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TREX vs. FND - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Trex Company, Inc. and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%20222023202420252026
40.5%
44.0%
Portfolio components
TREX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trex Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 139.02M and revenue of 343.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.5%.

FND - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 507.45M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.

TREX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trex Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 83.51M and revenue of 343.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.3%.

FND - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 52.40M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.6%.

TREX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trex Company, Inc. reported a net income of 61.40M and revenue of 343.40M, resulting in a net margin of 17.9%.

FND - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 39.71M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TREX and FND have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FND has higher volatility (15.29%) compared to TREX (14.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TREX dropped -90.53% vs FND's -69.65%.

TREX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.45 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TREX and FND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer