TRET.DE vs. TRET.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.DE) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS).
TRET.DE and TRET.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TRET.DE is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the GPR Global 100. It was launched on Apr 14, 2011. TRET.AS is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. It was launched on Apr 14, 2011. Both TRET.DE and TRET.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TRET.DE or TRET.AS.
Key characteristics
| TRET.DE | TRET.AS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.55% | 11.90% |
| 1Y Return | 23.66% | 27.66% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -1.41% | 0.55% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -0.01% | 2.53% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.54 | 1.89 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.28 | 2.72 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.27 | 1.34 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.75 | 0.24 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.93 | 10.26 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.51% | 2.34% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.31% | 13.20% |
| Max Drawdown | -42.38% | -99.19% |
| Current Drawdown | -11.32% | -97.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRET.DE and TRET.AS is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
TRET.DE vs. TRET.AS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, TRET.DE achieves a 8.55% return, which is significantly lower than TRET.AS's 11.90% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRET.DE vs. TRET.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TRET.DE and TRET.AS have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TRET.DE vs. TRET.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.DE) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TRET.DE vs. TRET.AS - Dividend Comparison
TRET.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRET.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRET.DE VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.83% | 4.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRET.AS VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 3.35% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 1.78% | 4.43% | 3.33% | 4.31% | 3.16% | 3.13% | 2.55% | 2.70% | 3.01% |
Drawdowns
TRET.DE vs. TRET.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRET.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.38%, smaller than the maximum TRET.AS drawdown of -99.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRET.DE and TRET.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TRET.DE vs. TRET.AS - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.DE) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS) have volatilities of 4.20% and 4.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.