PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TRET.AS vs. IWDA.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


TRET.ASIWDA.L
YTD Return12.86%19.15%
1Y Return26.19%31.39%
3Y Return (Ann)1.59%8.14%
5Y Return (Ann)2.43%13.00%
10Y Return (Ann)5.76%10.73%
Sharpe Ratio2.102.68
Sortino Ratio3.133.79
Omega Ratio1.391.49
Calmar Ratio0.302.43
Martin Ratio12.9617.24
Ulcer Index2.29%1.81%
Daily Std Dev14.27%11.64%
Max Drawdown-99.19%-34.11%
Current Drawdown-97.91%-0.32%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between TRET.AS and IWDA.L is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

TRET.AS vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, TRET.AS achieves a 12.86% return, which is significantly lower than IWDA.L's 19.15% return. Over the past 10 years, TRET.AS has underperformed IWDA.L with an annualized return of 5.76%, while IWDA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.73% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
20.25%
14.30%
TRET.AS
IWDA.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TRET.AS vs. IWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRET.AS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


TRET.AS
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
Expense ratio chart for TRET.AS: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for IWDA.L: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TRET.AS vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRET.AS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TRET.AS, currently valued at 2.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TRET.AS, currently valued at 3.42, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.42
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TRET.AS, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.44
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TRET.AS, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.36
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TRET.AS, currently valued at 11.07, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0011.07
IWDA.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IWDA.L, currently valued at 3.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.003.13
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IWDA.L, currently valued at 4.44, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.44
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IWDA.L, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.59
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IWDA.L, currently valued at 2.79, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.79
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IWDA.L, currently valued at 20.71, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0020.71

TRET.AS vs. IWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRET.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRET.AS and IWDA.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
2.22
3.13
TRET.AS
IWDA.L

Dividends

TRET.AS vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

TRET.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, while IWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
TRET.AS
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
3.32%3.67%4.68%1.78%4.43%3.33%4.31%3.16%3.13%2.55%2.70%3.01%
IWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TRET.AS vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRET.AS drawdown since its inception was -99.19%, which is greater than IWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -34.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRET.AS and IWDA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-98.29%
-0.32%
TRET.AS
IWDA.L

Volatility

TRET.AS vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) have volatilities of 2.53% and 2.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
2.53%
2.50%
TRET.AS
IWDA.L