PortfoliosLab logo
TREE vs. MA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between TREE and MA is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

TREE vs. MA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) and Mastercard Inc (MA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TREE:

-0.23

MA:

1.30

Sortino Ratio

TREE:

0.17

MA:

1.81

Omega Ratio

TREE:

1.02

MA:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

TREE:

-0.20

MA:

1.64

Martin Ratio

TREE:

-0.79

MA:

6.83

Ulcer Index

TREE:

23.02%

MA:

4.01%

Daily Std Dev

TREE:

76.01%

MA:

21.10%

Max Drawdown

TREE:

-97.59%

MA:

-62.67%

Current Drawdown

TREE:

-91.31%

MA:

-0.90%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TREE:

$509.60M

MA:

$532.51B

EPS

TREE:

-$4.14

MA:

$14.23

PEG Ratio

TREE:

3.55

MA:

2.34

PS Ratio

TREE:

0.52

MA:

18.32

PB Ratio

TREE:

4.95

MA:

79.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

TREE:

$972.18M

MA:

$29.07B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TREE:

$934.74M

MA:

$22.22B

EBITDA (TTM)

TREE:

$75.36M

MA:

$17.36B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TREE achieves a -2.84% return, which is significantly lower than MA's 10.70% return. Over the past 10 years, TREE has underperformed MA with an annualized return of -4.06%, while MA has yielded a comparatively higher 20.88% annualized return.


TREE

YTD

-2.84%

1M

-16.11%

6M

-12.32%

1Y

-17.45%

3Y*

-15.75%

5Y*

-31.91%

10Y*

-4.06%

MA

YTD

10.70%

1M

12.33%

6M

12.21%

1Y

27.17%

3Y*

20.74%

5Y*

15.23%

10Y*

20.88%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LendingTree, Inc.

Mastercard Inc

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TREE vs. MA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TREE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TREE is 3838
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TREE is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TREE is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TREE is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TREE is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TREE is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

MA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MA is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MA is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MA is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MA is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MA is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MA is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TREE vs. MA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) and Mastercard Inc (MA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TREE Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the MA Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TREE and MA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

TREE vs. MA - Dividend Comparison

TREE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TREE
LendingTree, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MA
Mastercard Inc
0.49%0.50%0.53%0.56%0.49%0.45%0.44%0.53%0.58%0.74%0.66%0.51%

Drawdowns

TREE vs. MA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TREE drawdown since its inception was -97.59%, which is greater than MA's maximum drawdown of -62.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TREE and MA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

TREE vs. MA - Volatility Comparison

LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) has a higher volatility of 30.08% compared to Mastercard Inc (MA) at 4.89%. This indicates that TREE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

TREE vs. MA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LendingTree, Inc. and Mastercard Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20212022202320242025
239.73M
7.25B
(TREE) Total Revenue
(MA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TREE vs. MA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LendingTree, Inc. and Mastercard Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

75.0%80.0%85.0%90.0%95.0%20212022202320242025
95.9%
76.7%
(TREE) Gross Margin
(MA) Gross Margin
TREE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, LendingTree, Inc. reported a gross profit of 229.82M and revenue of 239.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.

MA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Mastercard Inc reported a gross profit of 5.56B and revenue of 7.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.7%.

TREE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, LendingTree, Inc. reported an operating income of -7.11M and revenue of 239.73M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.0%.

MA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Mastercard Inc reported an operating income of 4.15B and revenue of 7.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 57.2%.

TREE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, LendingTree, Inc. reported a net income of -12.38M and revenue of 239.73M, resulting in a net margin of -5.2%.

MA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Mastercard Inc reported a net income of 3.28B and revenue of 7.25B, resulting in a net margin of 45.2%.