TREE vs. MA

In the year-to-date period, TREE achieves a 16.03% return, which is significantly higher than MA's 8.13% return. Over the past 10 years, TREE has underperformed MA with an annualized return of 0.25%, while MA has yielded a comparatively higher 20.93% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) and Mastercard Inc (MA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current TREE Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the MA Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TREE and MA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

TREE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.

The maximum TREE drawdown since its inception was -97.59%, which is greater than MA's maximum drawdown of -62.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TREE and MA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) has a higher volatility of 22.90% compared to Mastercard Inc (MA) at 5.16%. This indicates that TREE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LendingTree, Inc. and Mastercard Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.