PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TRAK vs. TRML
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


TRAKTRML
YTD Return98.52%-26.39%
1Y Return131.82%60.67%
3Y Return (Ann)55.95%-30.45%
Sharpe Ratio3.410.70
Daily Std Dev39.20%87.21%
Max Drawdown-99.70%-94.97%
Current Drawdown-88.90%-76.69%

Fundamentals


TRAKTRML
Market Cap$361.38M$456.67M
EPS$0.28-$1.92
Total Revenue (TTM)$15.27M$2.28M
Gross Profit (TTM)$11.80M$880.00K
EBITDA (TTM)$4.65M-$54.49M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between TRAK and TRML is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

TRAK vs. TRML - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, TRAK achieves a 98.52% return, which is significantly higher than TRML's -26.39% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-100.00%0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
306.58%
-73.30%
TRAK
TRML

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TRAK vs. TRML - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Park City Group Inc (TRAK) and Tourmaline Bio Inc. (TRML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRAK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TRAK, currently valued at 3.41, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.003.41
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TRAK, currently valued at 3.94, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.94
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TRAK, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TRAK, currently valued at 7.97, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.007.97
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TRAK, currently valued at 21.54, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0021.54
TRML
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TRML, currently valued at 0.70, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.70
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TRML, currently valued at 1.43, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.43
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TRML, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.30
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TRML, currently valued at 0.69, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.000.69
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TRML, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.001.35

TRAK vs. TRML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRAK Sharpe Ratio is 3.41, which is higher than the TRML Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of TRAK and TRML.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.006.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
3.41
0.70
TRAK
TRML

Dividends

TRAK vs. TRML - Dividend Comparison

TRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than TRML's 78.45% yield.


TTM20232022
TRAK
Park City Group Inc
0.33%0.76%0.30%
TRML
Tourmaline Bio Inc.
78.45%57.75%0.00%

Drawdowns

TRAK vs. TRML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRAK drawdown since its inception was -99.70%, roughly equal to the maximum TRML drawdown of -94.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRAK and TRML. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember0
-76.69%
TRAK
TRML

Volatility

TRAK vs. TRML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Park City Group Inc (TRAK) is 9.95%, while Tourmaline Bio Inc. (TRML) has a volatility of 22.98%. This indicates that TRAK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
9.95%
22.98%
TRAK
TRML

Financials

TRAK vs. TRML - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Park City Group Inc and Tourmaline Bio Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items