TRAK vs. TRML

In the year-to-date period, TRAK achieves a -3.44% return, which is significantly higher than TRML's -16.72% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Park City Group Inc (TRAK) and Tourmaline Bio Inc. (TRML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current TRAK Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the TRML Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRAK and TRML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

TRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, while TRML has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum TRAK drawdown since its inception was -96.87%, roughly equal to the maximum TRML drawdown of -94.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRAK and TRML. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Park City Group Inc (TRAK) is 12.88%, while Tourmaline Bio Inc. (TRML) has a volatility of 23.05%. This indicates that TRAK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Park City Group Inc and Tourmaline Bio Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.