PortfoliosLab logo
TR vs. CWT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between TR and CWT is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

TR vs. CWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) and California Water Service Group (CWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TR:

1.14

CWT:

-0.02

Sortino Ratio

TR:

1.56

CWT:

0.09

Omega Ratio

TR:

1.18

CWT:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

TR:

0.71

CWT:

-0.03

Martin Ratio

TR:

4.20

CWT:

-0.11

Ulcer Index

TR:

6.14%

CWT:

11.07%

Daily Std Dev

TR:

25.17%

CWT:

23.06%

Max Drawdown

TR:

-47.42%

CWT:

-38.24%

Current Drawdown

TR:

-15.52%

CWT:

-29.40%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TR:

$2.42B

CWT:

$2.79B

EPS

TR:

$1.23

CWT:

$2.26

PE Ratio

TR:

29.29

CWT:

20.74

PEG Ratio

TR:

0.00

CWT:

2.70

PS Ratio

TR:

3.37

CWT:

2.88

PB Ratio

TR:

2.99

CWT:

1.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

TR:

$718.50M

CWT:

$970.03M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TR:

$254.85M

CWT:

$532.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

TR:

$127.25M

CWT:

$351.41M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TR achieves a 13.90% return, which is significantly higher than CWT's 5.61% return. Over the past 10 years, TR has underperformed CWT with an annualized return of 4.49%, while CWT has yielded a comparatively higher 8.98% annualized return.


TR

YTD

13.90%

1M

11.41%

6M

11.56%

1Y

28.39%

3Y*

6.75%

5Y*

4.20%

10Y*

4.49%

CWT

YTD

5.61%

1M

-6.13%

6M

-6.48%

1Y

-0.50%

3Y*

-2.15%

5Y*

2.04%

10Y*

8.98%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.

California Water Service Group

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TR vs. CWT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TR is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TR is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TR is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TR is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TR is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TR is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

CWT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CWT is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CWT is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CWT is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CWT is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CWT is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CWT is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TR vs. CWT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) and California Water Service Group (CWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TR Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is higher than the CWT Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TR and CWT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

TR vs. CWT - Dividend Comparison

TR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than CWT's 2.46% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TR
Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.
0.98%1.10%1.08%0.85%1.27%1.21%1.05%1.08%0.99%0.89%1.10%1.04%
CWT
California Water Service Group
2.46%2.43%2.01%1.65%1.28%1.57%1.53%1.57%1.59%2.04%2.88%2.64%

Drawdowns

TR vs. CWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TR drawdown since its inception was -47.42%, which is greater than CWT's maximum drawdown of -38.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TR and CWT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

TR vs. CWT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) is 7.52%, while California Water Service Group (CWT) has a volatility of 8.17%. This indicates that TR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

TR vs. CWT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. and California Water Service Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B20212022202320242025
148.46M
203.97M
(TR) Total Revenue
(CWT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TR vs. CWT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. and California Water Service Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
34.4%
67.0%
(TR) Gross Margin
(CWT) Gross Margin
TR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 51.02M and revenue of 148.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.4%.

CWT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, California Water Service Group reported a gross profit of 136.58M and revenue of 203.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.0%.

TR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.06M and revenue of 148.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.5%.

CWT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, California Water Service Group reported an operating income of 22.35M and revenue of 203.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.

TR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 18.06M and revenue of 148.46M, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.

CWT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, California Water Service Group reported a net income of 13.33M and revenue of 203.97M, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.