TR vs. CWT
Compare and contrast key facts about Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) and California Water Service Group (CWT).
Performance
TR vs. CWT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TR vs. CWT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TR Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. | 20.38% | 17.87% | 1.36% | -18.76% | 22.25% | 27.01% | -12.02% | 3.23% | -7.18% | -4.77% |
CWT California Water Service Group | 5.43% | -1.81% | -10.64% | -12.83% | -14.13% | 35.05% | 6.68% | 9.85% | 7.06% | 36.39% |
Fundamentals
TR:
$1.29
CWT:
$2.15
TR:
33.20
CWT:
21.09
TR:
2.79
CWT:
0.51
TR:
4.27
CWT:
2.70
TR:
$729.62M
CWT:
$1.00B
TR:
$262.41M
CWT:
$436.14M
TR:
$167.88M
CWT:
$329.61M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TR achieves a 20.38% return, which is significantly higher than CWT's 5.43% return. Over the past 10 years, TR has underperformed CWT with an annualized return of 5.08%, while CWT has yielded a comparatively higher 7.48% annualized return.
TR
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- YTD
- 20.38%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 41.08%
- 3Y*
- 2.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.58%
- 10Y*
- 5.08%
CWT
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 5.43%
- 6M
- 0.20%
- 1Y
- -3.91%
- 3Y*
- -5.76%
- 5Y*
- -2.19%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TR vs. CWT — Risk / Return Rank
TR
CWT
TR vs. CWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) and California Water Service Group (CWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TR | CWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.62 | -0.17 | +1.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.15 | -0.08 | +2.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.99 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | -0.22 | +2.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.23 | -0.37 | +5.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TR | CWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | -0.17 | +1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | -0.09 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | 0.27 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.31 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between TR and CWT is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TR vs. CWT - Dividend Comparison
TR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than CWT's 2.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TR Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. | 0.82% | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.08% | 0.85% | 0.99% | 1.21% | 1.05% | 1.08% | 0.99% | 0.91% | 1.11% |
CWT California Water Service Group | 2.72% | 2.86% | 2.47% | 2.01% | 1.65% | 1.28% | 1.57% | 1.53% | 1.57% | 1.59% | 2.04% | 2.88% |
Drawdowns
TR vs. CWT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TR drawdown since its inception was -44.74%, which is greater than CWT's maximum drawdown of -38.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TR and CWT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TR | CWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.74% | -38.21% | -6.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.03% | -16.03% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.41% | -38.21% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.41% | -38.21% | +1.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -30.76% | +30.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.81% | -11.59% | -5.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.99% | 9.56% | -1.57% |
Volatility
TR vs. CWT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) is 6.72%, while California Water Service Group (CWT) has a volatility of 8.43%. This indicates that TR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TR | CWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.72% | 8.43% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.67% | 17.84% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.46% | 23.04% | +2.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.77% | 23.85% | +0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.13% | 27.56% | -2.43% |
Financials
TR vs. CWT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. and California Water Service Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TR vs. CWT - Profitability Comparison
TR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 77.87M and revenue of 232.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.5%.
CWT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, California Water Service Group reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 219.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
TR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 32.37M and revenue of 232.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.
CWT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, California Water Service Group reported an operating income of 25.60M and revenue of 219.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.
TR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 35.66M and revenue of 232.71M, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.
CWT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, California Water Service Group reported a net income of 11.48M and revenue of 219.98M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.