TQQQ vs. FNGU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) and FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both Leveraged Equities funds - TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%) while FNGU tracks the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TQQQ returned 100.69% vs 17.53% for FNGU. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TQQQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for FNGU.

Performance

TQQQ vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a 41.43% return, which is significantly higher than FNGU's -0.99% return.

TQQQ

• 1D: -9.86%
• 1M: -4.37%
• YTD: 41.43%
• 6M: 35.75%
• 1Y: 100.69%
• 3Y*: 58.02%
• 5Y*: 21.47%
• 10Y*: 45.48%

FNGU

• 1D: -7.64%
• 1M: -12.95%
• YTD: -0.99%
• 6M: -5.84%
• 1Y: 17.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQQ vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	41.43%	17.60%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	-0.99%	3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between TQQQ and FNGU is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.89

The correlation between TQQQ and FNGU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

TQQQ vs. FNGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TQQQ	FNGU
Technology	53.8%	60.6%
Communication Services	15.8%	29.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	9.6%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	-
Healthcare	4.2%	-
Industrials	2.8%	-
Utilities	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	1.1%	-
Energy	0.6%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

TQQQ vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQQ

TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 53
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 49
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 52

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 13
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 16
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQQ vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TQQQ	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	0.27	+1.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	0.81	+1.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.10	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	0.30	+2.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.72	0.70	+8.02

TQQQ vs. FNGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQQQ and FNGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TQQQ vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, which is greater than FNGU's maximum drawdown of -61.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and FNGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	TQQQ	FNGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.66%	-61.30%	-20.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.97%	-59.55%	+22.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-81.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.65%	-30.82%	+16.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.49%	-22.27%	+3.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.59%	25.17%	-13.58%

Volatility

TQQQ vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) is 27.27%, while MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) has a volatility of 33.21%. This indicates that TQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TQQQ	FNGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.27%	33.21%	-5.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.35%	52.56%	-9.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.39%	64.46%	-11.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.41%	81.18%	-13.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.32%	81.18%	-14.86%

TQQQ vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGU's 2.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

TQQQ vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	0.42%	0.65%	1.27%	1.26%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TQQQ and FNGU in my portfolio?

TQQQ and FNGU have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TQQQ or FNGU?

FNGU has higher volatility (33.21%) compared to TQQQ (27.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQQ dropped -81.66% vs FNGU's -61.30%.

Which ETF is better, TQQQ or FNGU?

On 1-year performance, TQQQ leads with 100.69% vs 17.53% for FNGU. On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 27.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TQQQ or FNGU?

Over the 1-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 100.69% return vs 17.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TQQQ or FNGU?

TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 2.60% for FNGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TQQQ or FNGU?

TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.00% for FNGU.

What is the main difference between TQQQ and FNGU?

TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while FNGU tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Bank of Montreal. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TQQQ and 2.60% for FNGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.