PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPSA.AS vs. AAAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPSA.AS vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (TPSA.AS) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TPSA.AS is traded in EUR, while AAAU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AAAU values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPSA.AS achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than AAAU's 5.01% return.


TPSA.AS

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.70%
YTD
2.53%
6M
1.56%
1Y
3.01%
3Y*
1.06%
5Y*
1.90%
10Y*
2.38%

AAAU

1D
0.73%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
5.01%
6M
6.63%
1Y
30.33%
3Y*
27.98%
5Y*
19.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPSA.AS vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TPSA.AS
iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.53%-5.59%8.47%0.33%-7.67%15.08%1.51%11.11%-2.72%
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
5.01%44.59%35.29%9.58%5.67%3.17%14.71%20.84%8.07%

Correlation

The correlation between TPSA.AS and AAAU is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2018

0.20

The correlation between TPSA.AS and AAAU shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPSA.AS vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPSA.AS
TPSA.AS Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TPSA.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPSA.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPSA.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TPSA.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPSA.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

AAAU
AAAU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AAAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAU Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPSA.AS vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (TPSA.AS) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TPSA.ASAAAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.25

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

1.78

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.95

4.26

-2.31

TPSA.AS vs. AAAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPSA.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the AAAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPSA.AS and AAAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TPSA.ASAAAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

1.22

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

1.19

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

1.15

-0.69

Drawdowns

TPSA.AS vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPSA.AS drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -18.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPSA.AS and AAAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPSA.ASAAAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.92%

-18.54%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.97%

-17.11%

+13.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.93%

-17.11%

+6.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.19%

-17.11%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.08%

-15.47%

+7.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.59%

-5.27%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

7.14%

-5.56%

Volatility

TPSA.AS vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (TPSA.AS) is 0.89%, while Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that TPSA.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPSA.ASAAAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

4.61%

-3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.83%

21.58%

-17.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.86%

24.92%

-19.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.38%

16.57%

-8.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.15%

15.81%

-7.66%

TPSA.AS vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPSA.AS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TPSA.AS vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison

Neither TPSA.AS nor AAAU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TPSA.AS and AAAU have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TPSA.AS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TPSA.AS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for AAAU.

TPSA.AS is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while AAAU is Gold. TPSA.AS tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while AAAU tracks LBMA Gold PM Price. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for TPSA.AS and 0.18% for AAAU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPSA.AS and AAAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer