TPMN vs. BDGS

In the year-to-date period, TPMN achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 1.92% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

TPMN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Market Neutral ETF (TPMN) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current TPMN Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPMN and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

TPMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than BDGS's 1.78% yield.

The maximum TPMN drawdown since its inception was -5.10%, smaller than the maximum BDGS drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPMN and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Timothy Plan Market Neutral ETF (TPMN) is 1.61%, while Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) has a volatility of 1.73%. This indicates that TPMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.