TPLC vs. CIBR
TPLC (Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPLC is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Victory U.S. Large Cap Volatility Weighted BRI Index, while CIBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TPLC returned 8.22%/yr vs 16.28%/yr for CIBR. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TPLC charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.
Performance
TPLC vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPLC achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.52% return.
TPLC
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 8.78%
- 6M
- 7.78%
- 1Y
- 12.59%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 31.43%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 24.03%
- 1Y
- 25.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- 18.49%
TPLC vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPLC Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund | 8.78% | 7.08% | 13.10% | 15.17% | -12.58% | 26.34% | 14.55% | 9.83% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 28.52% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 2.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPLC and CIBR is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2019 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TPLC and CIBR has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
TPLC vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TPLC
CIBR
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Industrials
TPLC
CIBR
Technology
TPLC
CIBR
Financial Services
TPLC
CIBR
-
Utilities
TPLC
CIBR
-
Healthcare
TPLC
CIBR
-
Consumer Cyclical
TPLC
CIBR
-
Energy
TPLC
CIBR
-
Basic Materials
TPLC
CIBR
-
Consumer Defensive
TPLC
CIBR
-
Real Estate
TPLC
CIBR
-
Communication Services
TPLC
CIBR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPLC vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
TPLC
CIBR
TPLC vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TPLC | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.20 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 1.18 | +0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.94 | 2.79 | +3.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TPLC | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 1.06 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.66 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.67 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
TPLC vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPLC drawdown since its inception was -38.02%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPLC and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPLC | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.02% | -33.89% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.58% | -21.99% | +14.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.18% | -21.99% | +3.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.63% | -33.89% | +12.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -2.81% | +2.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.29% | -8.66% | +3.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 9.25% | -7.12% |
Volatility
TPLC vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) is 2.70%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that TPLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPLC | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | 10.90% | -8.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.45% | 20.90% | -12.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.50% | 24.50% | -13.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 24.95% | -8.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.89% | 23.60% | -3.71% |
TPLC vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPLC has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPLC vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
TPLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than CIBR's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.45% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
TPLC Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund | 0.84% | 0.89% | 0.88% | 0.89% | 1.06% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPLC and CIBR have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to TPLC (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPLC dropped -38.02% vs CIBR's -33.89%.
On 5-year performance, CIBR leads with 16.28% vs 8.22% for TPLC. On fees, TPLC is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, TPLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 16.28% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TPLC is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.
TPLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.
TPLC is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while CIBR is Technology Equities. TPLC tracks Victory U.S. Large Cap Volatility Weighted BRI Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for TPLC and 0.60% for CIBR.
TPLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPLC and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer