TPC vs. PWR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR).

Performance

TPC vs. PWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TPC vs. PWR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TPC Tutor Perini Corporation	15.27%	177.18%	165.93%	20.53%	-38.97%	-4.48%	0.70%	-19.47%	-37.00%	-9.46%
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.	30.11%	33.70%	46.60%	51.70%	24.63%	59.50%	77.74%	35.84%	-22.93%	12.22%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TPC : $4.15B PWR : $83.28B
EPS TPC : $4.97 PWR : $6.79
PE Ratio TPC : 15.54 PWR : 80.81
PS Ratio TPC : 0.75 PWR : 2.93
PB Ratio TPC : 3.41 PWR : 9.32
Total Revenue (TTM) TPC : $5.54B PWR : $28.35B
Gross Profit (TTM) TPC : $647.52M PWR : $3.69B
EBITDA (TTM) TPC : $286.91M PWR : $2.61B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPC achieves a 15.27% return, which is significantly lower than PWR's 30.11% return. Over the past 10 years, TPC has underperformed PWR with an annualized return of 17.68%, while PWR has yielded a comparatively higher 37.93% annualized return.

TPC

• 1D: 5.99%
• 1M: 2.50%
• YTD: 15.27%
• 6M: 17.89%
• 1Y: 233.57%
• 3Y*: 132.28%
• 5Y*: 32.43%
• 10Y*: 17.68%

PWR

• 1D: 2.86%
• 1M: -2.50%
• YTD: 30.11%
• 6M: 32.55%
• 1Y: 116.24%
• 3Y*: 49.01%
• 5Y*: 44.09%
• 10Y*: 37.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TPC vs. PWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPC

TPC Risk / Return Rank: 98
TPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
TPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
TPC Omega Ratio Rank: 97
TPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
TPC Martin Ratio Rank: 99

PWR

PWR Risk / Return Rank: 97
PWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
PWR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PWR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPC vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TPC	PWR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.34	3.29	+1.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.54	3.82	+0.72
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	1.52	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.48	9.96	-0.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	30.66	24.49	+6.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TPC vs. PWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPC Sharpe Ratio is 4.34, which is higher than the PWR Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPC and PWR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TPC	PWR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.34	3.29	+1.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	1.28	-0.68
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27	1.15	-0.88
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.33	-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between TPC and PWR is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TPC vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison

TPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, more than PWR's 0.07% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TPC Tutor Perini Corporation	0.16%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.	0.07%	0.09%	0.09%	0.15%	0.25%	0.16%	0.29%	0.42%	0.13%

Drawdowns

TPC vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPC drawdown since its inception was -95.89%, roughly equal to the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPC and PWR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPC	PWR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.89%	-97.07%	+1.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.13%	-11.66%	-12.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.94%	-33.89%	-40.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-91.02%	-45.53%	-45.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.57%	-5.09%	-8.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.11%	-47.15%	-4.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.46%	4.74%	+2.72%

Volatility

TPC vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison

Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC) has a higher volatility of 15.85% compared to Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) at 11.17%. This indicates that TPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TPC	PWR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.85%	11.17%	+4.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.75%	26.43%	+7.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.20%	35.55%	+18.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.81%	34.66%	+20.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	65.34%	33.20%	+32.14%

Financials

TPC vs. PWR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tutor Perini Corporation and Quanta Services, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TPC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tutor Perini Corporation reported a gross profit of 147.72M and revenue of 1.51B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.8%.

PWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 985.00M and revenue of 7.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.6%.

TPC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tutor Perini Corporation reported an operating income of 50.11M and revenue of 1.51B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.

PWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 485.00M and revenue of 7.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.

TPC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tutor Perini Corporation reported a net income of 214.33M and revenue of 1.51B, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.

PWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 315.50M and revenue of 7.84B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.