TOTL vs. IOO
Compare and contrast key facts about State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF (TOTL) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO).
TOTL and IOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TOTL is an actively managed fund by State Street. It was launched on Feb 23, 2015. IOO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 5, 2000.
Performance
TOTL vs. IOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TOTL vs. IOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOTL State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF | -0.46% | 7.68% | 3.15% | 5.55% | -11.59% | -1.00% | 3.56% | 6.93% | 0.76% | 3.55% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | -3.64% | 27.02% | 26.54% | 27.71% | -16.34% | 26.03% | 18.61% | 30.01% | -6.22% | 23.56% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOTL achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly higher than IOO's -3.64% return. Over the past 10 years, TOTL has underperformed IOO with an annualized return of 1.74%, while IOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.13% annualized return.
TOTL
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 3.75%
- 3Y*
- 4.16%
- 5Y*
- 0.74%
- 10Y*
- 1.74%
IOO
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -3.87%
- YTD
- -3.64%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 27.60%
- 3Y*
- 21.83%
- 5Y*
- 14.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TOTL vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOTL has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IOO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TOTL vs. IOO — Risk / Return Rank
TOTL
IOO
TOTL vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF (TOTL) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TOTL | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 1.44 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.43 | 2.13 | -0.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.31 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 2.26 | -0.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.33 | 10.66 | -6.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TOTL | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 1.44 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.86 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.86 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.36 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between TOTL and IOO is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TOTL vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison
TOTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, more than IOO's 0.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOTL State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF | 5.27% | 5.23% | 5.35% | 4.85% | 4.68% | 3.07% | 2.91% | 3.31% | 3.41% | 3.00% | 3.25% | 2.67% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 0.95% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 1.49% | 2.00% | 1.53% | 1.49% | 2.02% | 2.54% | 2.23% | 2.75% | 2.89% |
Drawdowns
TOTL vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOTL drawdown since its inception was -16.48%, smaller than the maximum IOO drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOTL and IOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOTL | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.48% | -55.85% | +39.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | -12.40% | +9.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.48% | -23.52% | +7.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.48% | -31.43% | +14.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.09% | -5.98% | +3.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.15% | -11.34% | +8.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 2.63% | -1.73% |
Volatility
TOTL vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF (TOTL) is 1.51%, while iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) has a volatility of 6.23%. This indicates that TOTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TOTL | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | 6.23% | -4.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.37% | 10.71% | -8.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 19.24% | -15.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.57% | 16.97% | -11.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.76% | 17.74% | -12.98% |