TOPT vs. FELG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TOPT (iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF) and FELG (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. TOPT is passively managed, while FELG is actively managed. Over the past year, TOPT returned 30.17% vs 27.58% for FELG. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TOPT charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for FELG.

Performance

TOPT vs. FELG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF (TOPT) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOPT achieves a 8.94% return, which is significantly higher than FELG's 7.70% return.

TOPT

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 5.40%
• YTD: 8.94%
• 6M: 8.53%
• 1Y: 30.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FELG

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 5.85%
• YTD: 7.70%
• 6M: 7.23%
• 1Y: 27.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOPT vs. FELG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TOPT iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF	8.94%	20.35%	5.03%
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	7.70%	18.44%	5.28%

Correlation

The correlation between TOPT and FELG is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024	0.96

The correlation between TOPT and FELG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

TOPT vs. FELG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TOPT	FELG
Technology	43.6%	53.9%
Communication Services	19.4%	13.8%
Financial Services	12.4%	4.7%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	11.5%
Healthcare	7.7%	6.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	1.0%
Energy	3.0%	1.1%
Basic Materials	-	0.5%
Industrials	-	7.2%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Utilities	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

TOPT vs. FELG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOPT

TOPT Risk / Return Rank: 58
TOPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
TOPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
TOPT Omega Ratio Rank: 62
TOPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
TOPT Martin Ratio Rank: 51

FELG

FELG Risk / Return Rank: 44
FELG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FELG Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FELG Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FELG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FELG Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOPT vs. FELG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF (TOPT) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TOPT	FELG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	1.79	+0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	2.45	+0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.31	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	1.71	+0.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.73	5.86	+2.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TOPT vs. FELG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOPT Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the FELG Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOPT and FELG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TOPT	FELG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.22	1.79	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.12	1.32	-0.20

Drawdowns

TOPT vs. FELG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOPT drawdown since its inception was -21.21%, smaller than the maximum FELG drawdown of -23.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOPT and FELG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOPT	FELG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.21%	-23.89%	+2.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.13%	-16.17%	+3.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.25%	-1.34%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.48%	-3.52%	+0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	4.72%	-1.26%

Volatility

TOPT vs. FELG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF (TOPT) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) have volatilities of 3.46% and 3.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TOPT	FELG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.46%	3.50%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.14%	11.59%	-1.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.68%	15.46%	-1.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.83%	19.89%	-0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.83%	19.89%	-0.06%

TOPT vs. FELG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOPT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FELG's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TOPT vs. FELG - Dividend Comparison

TOPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, more than FELG's 0.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	0.34%	0.38%	0.44%	0.11%
TOPT iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF	0.36%	0.38%	0.08%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TOPT and FELG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, TOPT and FELG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TOPT or FELG?

FELG has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to TOPT (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOPT dropped -21.21% vs FELG's -23.89%.

Which ETF is better, TOPT or FELG?

On 1-year performance, TOPT leads with 30.17% vs 27.58% for FELG. On fees, FELG is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TOPT or FELG?

Over the 1-year period, TOPT has performed better with a 30.17% return vs 27.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TOPT or FELG?

FELG is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TOPT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TOPT or FELG?

TOPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.34% for FELG.

What is the main difference between TOPT and FELG?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TOPT and 0.18% for FELG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TOPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.