PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNL vs. VONG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TNL vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNL achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's 7.17% return. Over the past 10 years, TNL has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 12.59%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.61% annualized return.


TNL

1D
-2.38%
1M
12.40%
YTD
-0.08%
6M
2.93%
1Y
47.02%
3Y*
26.21%
5Y*
5.67%
10Y*
12.59%

VONG

1D
-1.32%
1M
5.68%
YTD
7.17%
6M
6.52%
1Y
25.74%
3Y*
24.92%
5Y*
15.38%
10Y*
18.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNL vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TNL
Travel + Leisure Co.
-0.08%45.46%34.76%12.51%-31.67%25.95%-8.59%50.09%-29.47%55.45%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
7.17%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between TNL and VONG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.54

The correlation between TNL and VONG shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNL vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNL
TNL Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
TNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNL Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
TNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNL Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNL vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TNLVONGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.31

1.68

-0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.95

2.29

-0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.29

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

1.59

+0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.21

5.34

+0.88

TNL vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNL Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNL and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TNLVONGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

1.68

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.72

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.89

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.90

-0.66

Drawdowns

TNL vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNL drawdown since its inception was -92.23%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNL and VONG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNLVONGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.23%

-32.72%

-59.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.06%

-16.23%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.18%

-23.27%

-8.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.03%

-32.72%

-12.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.07%

-32.72%

-35.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.26%

-1.66%

-9.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.54%

-4.88%

-15.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.59%

4.83%

+2.76%

Volatility

TNL vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL) has a higher volatility of 8.74% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 3.60%. This indicates that TNL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNLVONGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.74%

3.60%

+5.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.84%

11.61%

+14.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.08%

15.37%

+20.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.11%

21.33%

+15.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.99%

20.87%

+21.12%

Dividends

TNL vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

TNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than VONG's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TNL
Travel + Leisure Co.
3.26%3.18%3.96%4.60%4.40%2.26%3.57%3.48%170.40%2.00%2.62%2.31%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.43%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


TNL and VONG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNL has higher volatility (8.74%) compared to VONG (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNL dropped -92.23% vs VONG's -32.72%.

VONG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNL and VONG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer