TNA vs. RWJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ).
TNA and RWJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TNA is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index (300%). It was launched on Nov 5, 2008. RWJ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index. It was launched on Feb 22, 2008. Both TNA and RWJ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TNA or RWJ.
Correlation
The correlation between TNA and RWJ is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
TNA vs. RWJ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TNA:
0.26
RWJ:
0.63
TNA:
0.80
RWJ:
1.05
TNA:
1.10
RWJ:
1.12
TNA:
0.23
RWJ:
1.33
TNA:
1.22
RWJ:
3.28
TNA:
13.37%
RWJ:
4.12%
TNA:
62.24%
RWJ:
21.39%
TNA:
-88.09%
RWJ:
-55.97%
TNA:
-60.73%
RWJ:
-7.64%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNA achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly lower than RWJ's 11.35% return. Over the past 10 years, TNA has underperformed RWJ with an annualized return of 0.90%, while RWJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.38% annualized return.
TNA
9.32%
-16.09%
21.05%
7.79%
-9.65%
0.90%
RWJ
11.35%
-2.10%
14.31%
11.73%
16.37%
10.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TNA vs. RWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TNA has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than RWJ's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TNA vs. RWJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TNA vs. RWJ - Dividend Comparison
TNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than RWJ's 0.91% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares | 0.49% | 1.27% | 0.31% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.44% | 0.36% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.59% | 1.53% |
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | 0.91% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 0.61% | 0.89% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 0.91% | 0.60% | 0.74% | 0.57% | 1.27% |
Drawdowns
TNA vs. RWJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNA drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, which is greater than RWJ's maximum drawdown of -55.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNA and RWJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TNA vs. RWJ - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a higher volatility of 18.78% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) at 6.21%. This indicates that TNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.