TMFM vs. ITOT
TMFM (Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. TMFM is actively managed, while ITOT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TMFM returned 3.93%/yr vs 22.39%/yr for ITOT. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMFM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
TMFM vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFM achieves a -8.40% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.78% return.
TMFM
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- -8.40%
- 6M
- -9.85%
- 1Y
- -18.32%
- 3Y*
- 3.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 4.64%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 11.52%
- 1Y
- 28.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
TMFM vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -8.40% | -8.98% | 17.54% | 21.81% | -27.36% | 2.08% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 11.78% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | -19.47% | 2.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFM and ITOT is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TMFM and ITOT has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
TMFM vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TMFM
ITOT
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
TMFM
ITOT
Healthcare
TMFM
ITOT
Industrials
TMFM
ITOT
Financial Services
TMFM
ITOT
Real Estate
TMFM
ITOT
Consumer Cyclical
TMFM
ITOT
Consumer Defensive
TMFM
ITOT
Basic Materials
TMFM
-
ITOT
Communication Services
TMFM
-
ITOT
Energy
TMFM
-
ITOT
Utilities
TMFM
-
ITOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFM vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
TMFM
ITOT
TMFM vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMFM | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.43 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 3.25 | -3.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 14.92 | -16.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMFM | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.98 | 2.37 | -3.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.57 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
TMFM vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFM drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFM and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFM | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.75% | -55.20% | +23.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.34% | -8.90% | -18.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.75% | -19.44% | -12.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.46% | -0.25% | -25.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.86% | -6.97% | -8.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.70% | 1.94% | +12.76% |
Volatility
TMFM vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) has a higher volatility of 8.06% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.94%. This indicates that TMFM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFM | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.06% | 2.94% | +5.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.59% | 9.14% | +6.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.79% | 12.19% | +6.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 17.35% | +3.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 18.26% | +2.37% |
TMFM vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFM vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
TMFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than ITOT's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 0.97% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.06% | 16.27% | 2.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFM and ITOT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMFM has higher volatility (8.06%) compared to ITOT (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFM dropped -31.75% vs ITOT's -55.20%.
On 3-year performance, ITOT leads with 22.39% vs 3.93% for TMFM. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 22.39% return vs 3.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFM.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.07% for TMFM.
TMFM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFM and 0.03% for ITOT.
ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMFM and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer