PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMFM vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMFM vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFM achieves a -8.40% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.78% return.


TMFM

1D
1.21%
1M
3.69%
YTD
-8.40%
6M
-9.85%
1Y
-18.32%
3Y*
3.93%
5Y*
10Y*

ITOT

1D
0.48%
1M
4.64%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.52%
1Y
28.81%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMFM vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TMFM
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF
-8.40%-8.98%17.54%21.81%-27.36%2.08%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.78%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%2.14%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFM and ITOT is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between TMFM and ITOT has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

TMFM vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TMFM
ITOT

Technology

28.5%
33.8%

Healthcare

23.9%
9.0%

Industrials

21.4%
9.5%

Financial Services

14.0%
12.1%

Real Estate

5.1%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.9%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
4.7%

Basic Materials

-

2.1%

Communication Services

-

10.3%

Energy

-

3.7%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Technology

TMFM
28.5%
ITOT
33.8%

Healthcare

TMFM
23.9%
ITOT
9.0%

Industrials

TMFM
21.4%
ITOT
9.5%

Financial Services

TMFM
14.0%
ITOT
12.1%

Real Estate

TMFM
5.1%
ITOT
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

TMFM
4.9%
ITOT
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

TMFM
2.2%
ITOT
4.7%

Basic Materials

TMFM

-

ITOT
2.1%

Communication Services

TMFM

-

ITOT
10.3%

Energy

TMFM

-

ITOT
3.7%

Utilities

TMFM

-

ITOT
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMFM vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMFM
TMFM Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
TMFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMFM Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
TMFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMFM Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMFM vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMFMITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.43

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

3.25

-3.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.25

14.92

-16.17

TMFM vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFM Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFM and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMFMITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.98

2.37

-3.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.13

0.57

-0.70

Drawdowns

TMFM vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFM drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFM and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMFMITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.75%

-55.20%

+23.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.34%

-8.90%

-18.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.75%

-19.44%

-12.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.46%

-0.25%

-25.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.86%

-6.97%

-8.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.70%

1.94%

+12.76%

Volatility

TMFM vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) has a higher volatility of 8.06% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.94%. This indicates that TMFM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMFMITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.06%

2.94%

+5.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.59%

9.14%

+6.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.79%

12.19%

+6.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.63%

17.35%

+3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.63%

18.26%

+2.37%

TMFM vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMFM vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

TMFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than ITOT's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.97%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
TMFM
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.07%0.06%16.27%2.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMFM and ITOT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMFM has higher volatility (8.06%) compared to ITOT (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFM dropped -31.75% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 3-year performance, ITOT leads with 22.39% vs 3.93% for TMFM. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 22.39% return vs 3.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFM.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.07% for TMFM.

TMFM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFM and 0.03% for ITOT.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMFM and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer