TMFM vs. ITOT
TMFM (Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. TMFM is actively managed, while ITOT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TMFM returned 1.83%/yr vs 18.94%/yr for ITOT. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TMFM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
TMFM vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFM achieves a -5.79% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 10.57% return.
TMFM
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- 6M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- -5.79%
- 1Y
- -14.17%
- 3Y*
- 1.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.04%
ITOT
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- YTD
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 21.81%
- 3Y*
- 18.94%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $209.16M | $238.83M | $306.83M | |
| $157.21K | $169.51K | $230.30K |
TMFM vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -5.79% | -8.98% | 17.54% | 21.81% | -27.36% | 1.91% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 10.57% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | -19.47% | 1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFM and ITOT is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2021 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TMFM and ITOT has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
TMFM vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TMFM
ITOT
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
TMFM
ITOT
Healthcare
TMFM
ITOT
Industrials
TMFM
ITOT
Financial Services
TMFM
ITOT
Real Estate
TMFM
ITOT
Consumer Cyclical
TMFM
ITOT
Consumer Defensive
TMFM
ITOT
Basic Materials
TMFM
-
ITOT
Communication Services
TMFM
-
ITOT
Energy
TMFM
-
ITOT
Utilities
TMFM
-
ITOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFM vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
TMFM
ITOT
TMFM vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMFM | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.27 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 2.23 | -2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 9.56 | -10.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMFM vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFM drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFM and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFM | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.75% | -55.20% | +23.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.13% | -8.90% | -16.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.75% | -19.44% | -12.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.34% | -1.34% | -22.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -6.93% | -9.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.51% | 2.07% | +12.44% |
Volatility
TMFM vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 3.52%. This indicates that TMFM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFM | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 3.52% | +2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.23% | 10.27% | +5.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.69% | 13.14% | +6.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 17.47% | +3.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 18.27% | +2.33% |
TMFM vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFM vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
TMFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than ITOT's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.06% | 16.27% | 2.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFM and ITOT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMFM has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to ITOT (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFM dropped -31.75% vs ITOT's -55.20%.
On 3-year performance, ITOT leads with 18.94% vs 1.83% for TMFM. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 18.94% return vs 1.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFM.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.07% for TMFM.
TMFM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFM and 0.03% for ITOT.
ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMFM and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer