TMFG vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
TMFG and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TMFG is an actively managed fund by Motley Fool. It was launched on Jun 17, 2014. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TMFG or SCHG.
Correlation
The correlation between TMFG and SCHG is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
TMFG vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TMFG:
1.67
SCHG:
2.00
TMFG:
2.34
SCHG:
2.61
TMFG:
1.30
SCHG:
1.36
TMFG:
2.22
SCHG:
2.88
TMFG:
7.32
SCHG:
10.98
TMFG:
2.66%
SCHG:
3.25%
TMFG:
11.66%
SCHG:
17.90%
TMFG:
-33.66%
SCHG:
-34.59%
TMFG:
-2.82%
SCHG:
-0.76%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFG achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 3.62% return.
TMFG
3.12%
0.88%
10.62%
19.44%
N/A
N/A
SCHG
3.62%
1.09%
17.74%
34.84%
19.66%
17.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMFG vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TMFG vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
TMFG
SCHG
TMFG vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TMFG vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
TMFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.52%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF | 13.52% | 13.94% | 5.42% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.47% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% |
Drawdowns
TMFG vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFG drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFG and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TMFG vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) is 3.24%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that TMFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.