PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMFG vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMFG vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFG achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.25% return.


TMFG

1D
-0.39%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
1.99%
6M
2.14%
1Y
3.83%
3Y*
12.53%
5Y*
10Y*

ITOT

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.25%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMFG vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TMFG
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF
1.99%6.75%15.45%28.36%-28.17%1.21%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.25%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%2.14%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFG and ITOT is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021

0.88

The correlation between TMFG and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

TMFG vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TMFG
ITOT

Industrials

21.4%
9.5%

Financial Services

18.2%
12.1%

Communication Services

14.3%
10.3%

Technology

12.0%
33.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
10.1%

Real Estate

8.8%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
4.7%

Healthcare

5.6%
9.0%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.1%

Energy

-

3.7%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Industrials

TMFG
21.4%
ITOT
9.5%

Financial Services

TMFG
18.2%
ITOT
12.1%

Communication Services

TMFG
14.3%
ITOT
10.3%

Technology

TMFG
12.0%
ITOT
33.8%

Consumer Cyclical

TMFG
11.9%
ITOT
10.1%

Real Estate

TMFG
8.8%
ITOT
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

TMFG
5.9%
ITOT
4.7%

Healthcare

TMFG
5.6%
ITOT
9.0%

Basic Materials

TMFG
1.8%
ITOT
2.1%

Energy

TMFG

-

ITOT
3.7%

Utilities

TMFG

-

ITOT
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMFG vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMFG
TMFG Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
TMFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMFG Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TMFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMFG Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMFG vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMFGITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.42

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

3.17

-2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.10

14.57

-13.47

TMFG vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFG and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMFGITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

2.32

-2.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.57

-0.38

Drawdowns

TMFG vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFG drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFG and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMFGITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.66%

-55.20%

+21.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.81%

-8.90%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.60%

-19.44%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-0.73%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.49%

-6.97%

-3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

1.94%

+1.54%

Volatility

TMFG vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) is 2.64%, while iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that TMFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMFGITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

2.99%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.07%

9.13%

+0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.03%

12.20%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.60%

17.36%

+1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.60%

18.26%

+0.34%

TMFG vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMFG vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

TMFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than ITOT's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.98%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
TMFG
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF
0.26%0.27%13.94%5.42%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMFG and ITOT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITOT has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to TMFG (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFG dropped -33.66% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 3-year performance, ITOT leads with 22.09% vs 12.53% for TMFG. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, TMFG has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 22.09% return vs 12.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFG.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.26% for TMFG.

TMFG is categorized as Global Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFG and 0.03% for ITOT.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMFG and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer