TMFG vs. ITOT
TMFG (Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. TMFG is actively managed, while ITOT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TMFG returned 12.53%/yr vs 22.09%/yr for ITOT. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMFG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
TMFG vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFG achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.25% return.
TMFG
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 12.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
TMFG vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF | 1.99% | 6.75% | 15.45% | 28.36% | -28.17% | 1.21% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 11.25% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | -19.47% | 2.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFG and ITOT is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021 | 0.88 |
The correlation between TMFG and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
TMFG vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TMFG
ITOT
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
TMFG
ITOT
Financial Services
TMFG
ITOT
Communication Services
TMFG
ITOT
Technology
TMFG
ITOT
Consumer Cyclical
TMFG
ITOT
Real Estate
TMFG
ITOT
Consumer Defensive
TMFG
ITOT
Healthcare
TMFG
ITOT
Basic Materials
TMFG
ITOT
Energy
TMFG
-
ITOT
Utilities
TMFG
-
ITOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFG vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
TMFG
ITOT
TMFG vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMFG | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.42 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.33 | 3.17 | -2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | 14.57 | -13.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMFG | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 2.32 | -2.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.57 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
TMFG vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFG drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFG and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFG | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.66% | -55.20% | +21.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.81% | -8.90% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.60% | -19.44% | +2.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -0.73% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.49% | -6.97% | -3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 1.94% | +1.54% |
Volatility
TMFG vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) is 2.64%, while iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that TMFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFG | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 2.99% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.07% | 9.13% | +0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.03% | 12.20% | +0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 17.36% | +1.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 18.26% | +0.34% |
TMFG vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFG vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
TMFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than ITOT's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF | 0.26% | 0.27% | 13.94% | 5.42% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFG and ITOT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITOT has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to TMFG (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFG dropped -33.66% vs ITOT's -55.20%.
On 3-year performance, ITOT leads with 22.09% vs 12.53% for TMFG. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, TMFG has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 22.09% return vs 12.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFG.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.26% for TMFG.
TMFG is categorized as Global Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFG and 0.03% for ITOT.
ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMFG and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer