TMFC vs. MOAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT).
TMFC and MOAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TMFC is a passively managed fund by Motley Fool that tracks the performance of the Motley Fool 100 Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2018. MOAT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2012. Both TMFC and MOAT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TMFC or MOAT.
Correlation
The correlation between TMFC and MOAT is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
TMFC vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TMFC:
2.21
MOAT:
0.99
TMFC:
2.92
MOAT:
1.39
TMFC:
1.40
MOAT:
1.18
TMFC:
3.12
MOAT:
1.79
TMFC:
13.21
MOAT:
5.11
TMFC:
2.67%
MOAT:
2.31%
TMFC:
15.92%
MOAT:
11.95%
TMFC:
-33.06%
MOAT:
-33.31%
TMFC:
-3.49%
MOAT:
-4.75%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFC achieves a 35.30% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's 10.80% return.
TMFC
35.30%
3.24%
11.81%
34.85%
19.83%
N/A
MOAT
10.80%
-1.05%
9.26%
11.00%
12.44%
12.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMFC vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TMFC vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TMFC vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison
TMFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, while MOAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF | 0.40% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.50% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOAT VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 0.00% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.45% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% | 1.34% | 0.79% |
Drawdowns
TMFC vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFC drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, roughly equal to the maximum MOAT drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFC and MOAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TMFC vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 4.01%. This indicates that TMFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.