TM2.F vs. NRDBY
TM2.F (Sydbank A/S) and NRDBY (Nordea Bank Abp ADR) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 5 years, TM2.F returned 22.18%/yr vs 22.18%/yr for NRDBY. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TM2.F vs. NRDBY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TM2.F is traded in EUR, while NRDBY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NRDBY values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TM2.F achieves a -8.08% return, which is significantly lower than NRDBY's 6.01% return.
TM2.F
- 1D
- -3.59%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- -8.08%
- 6M
- -9.83%
- 1Y
- 15.32%
- 3Y*
- 21.17%
- 5Y*
- 22.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
NRDBY
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- 2.20%
- YTD
- 6.01%
- 6M
- 9.67%
- 1Y
- 33.64%
- 3Y*
- 27.57%
- 5Y*
- 22.18%
- 10Y*
- —
TM2.F vs. NRDBY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TM2.F Sydbank A/S | -8.08% | 48.63% | 32.58% | -1.04% | 44.25% | 57.83% | 5.45% | -8.51% | -19.02% |
NRDBY Nordea Bank Abp ADR | 6.01% | 64.73% | 1.94% | 20.74% | 1.20% | 73.56% | 9.03% | 8.81% | -21.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between TM2.F and NRDBY is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2018 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TM2.F vs. NRDBY — Risk / Return Rank
TM2.F
NRDBY
TM2.F vs. NRDBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sydbank A/S (TM2.F) and Nordea Bank Abp ADR (NRDBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TM2.F | NRDBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.28 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 2.99 | -2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.68 | 10.22 | -7.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TM2.F | NRDBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 1.62 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.94 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.65 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
TM2.F vs. NRDBY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TM2.F drawdown since its inception was -76.16%, which is greater than NRDBY's maximum drawdown of -47.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TM2.F and NRDBY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TM2.F | NRDBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.16% | -47.45% | -28.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.15% | -11.30% | -5.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.29% | -19.16% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.07% | -26.83% | +1.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.45% | -3.89% | -7.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.02% | -9.19% | -20.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.71% | 3.30% | +2.41% |
Volatility
TM2.F vs. NRDBY - Volatility Comparison
Sydbank A/S (TM2.F) has a higher volatility of 7.17% compared to Nordea Bank Abp ADR (NRDBY) at 6.30%. This indicates that TM2.F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NRDBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TM2.F | NRDBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.17% | 6.30% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.83% | 16.46% | +5.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.47% | 20.96% | +8.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.12% | 23.60% | +8.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.09% | 27.73% | +5.36% |
Dividends
TM2.F vs. NRDBY - Dividend Comparison
TM2.F's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than NRDBY's 6.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRDBY Nordea Bank Abp ADR | 6.18% | 5.17% | 9.06% | 7.05% | 7.23% | 7.50% | 10.93% | 9.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TM2.F Sydbank A/S | 0.65% | 0.64% | 1.07% | 0.77% | 0.55% | 0.63% | 6.20% | 0.91% | 1.01% | 0.57% | 0.69% | 0.43% |
Financials
TM2.F vs. NRDBY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sydbank A/S and Nordea Bank Abp ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TM2.F and NRDBY have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for TM2.F and NRDBY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer