TM2.F vs. AKRBY
TM2.F (Sydbank A/S) and AKRBY (Aker BP ASA) are both stocks. TM2.F operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while AKRBY operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 3 years, TM2.F returned 21.17%/yr vs 27.96%/yr for AKRBY. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
TM2.F vs. AKRBY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TM2.F is traded in EUR, while AKRBY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AKRBY values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TM2.F achieves a -8.08% return, which is significantly lower than AKRBY's 60.64% return.
TM2.F
- 1D
- -3.59%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- -8.08%
- 6M
- -9.83%
- 1Y
- 15.32%
- 3Y*
- 21.17%
- 5Y*
- 22.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
AKRBY
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 5.80%
- YTD
- 60.64%
- 6M
- 71.63%
- 1Y
- 72.99%
- 3Y*
- 27.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TM2.F vs. AKRBY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TM2.F Sydbank A/S | -8.08% | 48.63% | 32.58% | -5.50% |
AKRBY Aker BP ASA | 60.64% | 29.03% | -10.28% | -3.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between TM2.F and AKRBY is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TM2.F vs. AKRBY — Risk / Return Rank
TM2.F
AKRBY
TM2.F vs. AKRBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sydbank A/S (TM2.F) and Aker BP ASA (AKRBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TM2.F | AKRBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.28 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 3.60 | -2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.68 | 7.99 | -5.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TM2.F | AKRBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 1.11 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.33 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
TM2.F vs. AKRBY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TM2.F drawdown since its inception was -76.16%, which is greater than AKRBY's maximum drawdown of -29.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TM2.F and AKRBY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TM2.F | AKRBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.16% | -29.88% | -46.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.15% | -20.49% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.29% | -29.88% | +8.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.45% | -12.62% | +1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.02% | -11.07% | -18.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.71% | 9.20% | -3.49% |
Volatility
TM2.F vs. AKRBY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sydbank A/S (TM2.F) is 7.17%, while Aker BP ASA (AKRBY) has a volatility of 32.49%. This indicates that TM2.F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AKRBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TM2.F | AKRBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.17% | 32.49% | -25.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.83% | 52.67% | -30.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.47% | 66.70% | -37.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.12% | 59.81% | -27.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.09% | 59.81% | -26.72% |
Dividends
TM2.F vs. AKRBY - Dividend Comparison
TM2.F's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than AKRBY's 6.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AKRBY Aker BP ASA | 6.54% | 9.75% | 12.28% | 15.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TM2.F Sydbank A/S | 0.65% | 0.64% | 1.07% | 0.77% | 0.55% | 0.63% | 6.20% | 0.91% | 1.01% | 0.57% | 0.69% | 0.43% |
Financials
TM2.F vs. AKRBY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sydbank A/S and Aker BP ASA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TM2.F and AKRBY have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for TM2.F and AKRBY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer