TM2.F vs. AKRBY
Compare and contrast key facts about Sydbank A/S (TM2.F) and Aker BP ASA (AKRBY).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TM2.F or AKRBY.
Key characteristics
TM2.F | AKRBY | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 188.02% | -4.22% |
1Y Return | 183.05% | -4.22% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.50 | -0.20 |
Sortino Ratio | 8.88 | 0.08 |
Omega Ratio | 2.07 | 1.02 |
Calmar Ratio | 9.93 | -0.40 |
Martin Ratio | 26.78 | -0.88 |
Ulcer Index | 6.71% | 12.76% |
Daily Std Dev | 119.03% | 55.06% |
Max Drawdown | -76.16% | -27.86% |
Current Drawdown | -8.08% | -18.93% |
Fundamentals
TM2.F | AKRBY | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | €2.41B | $13.01B |
EPS | €8.11 | $1.14 |
PE Ratio | 5.72 | 9.04 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | €5.74B | $9.42B |
Correlation
The correlation between TM2.F and AKRBY is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
TM2.F vs. AKRBY - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, TM2.F achieves a 188.02% return, which is significantly higher than AKRBY's -4.22% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TM2.F vs. AKRBY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sydbank A/S (TM2.F) and Aker BP ASA (AKRBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TM2.F vs. AKRBY - Dividend Comparison
TM2.F's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.83%, more than AKRBY's 7.90% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sydbank A/S | 8.83% | 5.81% | 4.09% | 4.74% | 7.14% | 6.84% | 7.52% | 4.25% | 3.70% | 3.21% |
Aker BP ASA | 7.90% | 8.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TM2.F vs. AKRBY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TM2.F drawdown since its inception was -76.16%, which is greater than AKRBY's maximum drawdown of -27.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TM2.F and AKRBY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TM2.F vs. AKRBY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sydbank A/S (TM2.F) is 8.95%, while Aker BP ASA (AKRBY) has a volatility of 26.72%. This indicates that TM2.F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AKRBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
TM2.F vs. AKRBY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sydbank A/S and Aker BP ASA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities