PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTD vs. SCHF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLTD vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTD achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 15.56% return. Over the past 10 years, TLTD has underperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 9.50%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively higher 10.27% annualized return.


TLTD

1D
-0.79%
1M
2.60%
YTD
8.45%
6M
11.89%
1Y
26.70%
3Y*
19.83%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
9.50%

SCHF

1D
-0.86%
1M
5.91%
YTD
15.56%
6M
18.62%
1Y
32.67%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
10.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTD vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLTD
FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt
8.45%39.69%4.78%17.19%-13.74%12.84%4.21%21.26%-17.57%26.27%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
15.56%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%22.26%-14.29%26.03%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTD and SCHF is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2012

0.95

The correlation between TLTD and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

TLTD vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TLTD
SCHF

Financial Services

32.7%
20.6%

Industrials

13.5%
11.5%

Technology

10.3%
15.7%

Energy

7.7%
5.0%

Basic Materials

7.4%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
5.7%

Healthcare

4.2%
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
4.9%

Utilities

3.3%
1.7%

Communication Services

2.0%
2.3%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.7%

Financial Services

TLTD
32.7%
SCHF
20.6%

Industrials

TLTD
13.5%
SCHF
11.5%

Technology

TLTD
10.3%
SCHF
15.7%

Energy

TLTD
7.7%
SCHF
5.0%

Basic Materials

TLTD
7.4%
SCHF
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

TLTD
5.6%
SCHF
5.7%

Healthcare

TLTD
4.2%
SCHF
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

TLTD
3.5%
SCHF
4.9%

Utilities

TLTD
3.3%
SCHF
1.7%

Communication Services

TLTD
2.0%
SCHF
2.3%

Real Estate

TLTD
0.9%
SCHF
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLTD vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTD
TLTD Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TLTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTD Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTD Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTD vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLTDSCHFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

2.86

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.49

11.11

-2.62

TLTD vs. SCHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the SCHF Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTD and SCHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLTDSCHFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

2.09

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.60

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.60

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.44

+0.08

Drawdowns

TLTD vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTD drawdown since its inception was -40.62%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTD and SCHF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTDSCHFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.62%

-34.87%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.11%

-11.48%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.10%

-13.41%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.96%

-29.14%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.62%

-34.87%

-5.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-0.86%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.68%

-7.38%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

2.95%

+0.20%

Volatility

TLTD vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) is 4.34%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that TLTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTDSCHFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

5.66%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.99%

13.34%

-1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.46%

15.74%

-1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

16.39%

-0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.81%

17.18%

-0.37%

TLTD vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLTD vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison

TLTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than SCHF's 2.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
2.96%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%
TLTD
FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt
3.08%3.44%3.88%3.39%2.76%3.44%2.04%3.46%3.16%2.71%2.93%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, TLTD and SCHF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHF has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to TLTD (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTD dropped -40.62% vs SCHF's -34.87%.

On 10-year performance, SCHF leads with 10.27% vs 9.50% for TLTD. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, TLTD has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 10.27% return vs 9.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for TLTD.

TLTD has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.96% for SCHF.

TLTD is categorized as Global Equities, while SCHF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. TLTD tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for TLTD and 0.06% for SCHF.

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLTD and SCHF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer