TLT vs. BOND
TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) and BOND (PIMCO Active Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while BOND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. TLT is passively managed, while BOND is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, TLT returned -1.63%/yr vs 2.14%/yr for BOND. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TLT charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for BOND.
Performance
TLT vs. BOND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLT achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly lower than BOND's 0.09% return. Over the past 10 years, TLT has underperformed BOND with an annualized return of -1.63%, while BOND has yielded a comparatively higher 2.14% annualized return.
TLT
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 6M
- -1.32%
- 1Y
- 2.88%
- 3Y*
- -2.03%
- 5Y*
- -6.37%
- 10Y*
- -1.63%
BOND
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 5.82%
- 3Y*
- 4.83%
- 5Y*
- 0.43%
- 10Y*
- 2.14%
TLT vs. BOND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -0.56% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 2.77% | -31.23% | -4.60% | 18.15% | 14.12% | -1.61% | 9.18% |
BOND PIMCO Active Bond ETF | 0.09% | 8.39% | 2.77% | 6.48% | -14.57% | -0.77% | 7.80% | 8.54% | 0.08% | 4.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLT and BOND is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2012 | 0.78 |
The correlation between TLT and BOND shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLT vs. BOND — Risk / Return Rank
TLT
BOND
TLT vs. BOND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLT | BOND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.26 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 1.94 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.94 | 6.12 | -5.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLT | BOND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 1.48 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.40 | 0.07 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.11 | 0.42 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.63 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
TLT vs. BOND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLT drawdown since its inception was -48.35%, which is greater than BOND's maximum drawdown of -19.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLT and BOND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLT | BOND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.35% | -19.71% | -28.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.58% | -3.01% | -4.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.18% | -6.12% | -13.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.70% | -19.71% | -23.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.35% | -19.71% | -28.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.61% | -1.95% | -38.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.82% | -3.50% | -10.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 0.95% | +2.12% |
Volatility
TLT vs. BOND - Volatility Comparison
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) at 1.43%. This indicates that TLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLT | BOND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 1.43% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.51% | 2.94% | +3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.66% | 3.96% | +5.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.85% | 5.76% | +10.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.90% | 5.09% | +9.81% |
TLT vs. BOND - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BOND's 0.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLT vs. BOND - Dividend Comparison
TLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, less than BOND's 5.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOND PIMCO Active Bond ETF | 5.21% | 5.11% | 5.02% | 4.06% | 3.44% | 2.58% | 2.66% | 3.38% | 3.18% | 2.87% | 2.85% | 4.14% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.60% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, TLT and BOND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TLT has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to BOND (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLT dropped -48.35% vs BOND's -19.71%.
On 10-year performance, BOND leads with 2.14% vs -1.63% for TLT. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BOND has been the lower-risk option at 1.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, BOND has performed better with a 2.14% return vs -1.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for BOND.
BOND has the higher dividend yield at 5.21%, compared with 4.60% for TLT.
TLT is categorized as Government Bonds, while BOND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TLT and 0.54% for BOND.
BOND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TLT and BOND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer