PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLN vs. FICO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TLN vs. FICO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Talen Energy Corporation (TLN) and Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLN achieves a -10.87% return, which is significantly higher than FICO's -33.58% return.


TLN

1D
0.47%
1M
-8.38%
6M
-4.09%
YTD
-10.87%
1Y
-11.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
63.88%

FICO

1D
-1.45%
1M
-11.63%
6M
-23.25%
YTD
-33.58%
1Y
-18.69%
3Y*
10.62%
5Y*
16.47%
10Y*
24.21%
ALL TIME*
20.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$482.91M$385.62M$388.77M
$238.78M$242.43M$311.38M

TLN vs. FICO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TLN
Talen Energy Corporation
-10.87%86.05%66.50%
FICO
Fair Isaac Corporation
-33.58%-15.08%26.97%

Correlation

The correlation between TLN and FICO is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2024

0.16

The correlation between TLN and FICO shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TLN:

$15.17B

FICO:

$24.25B

EPS

TLN:

-$0.44

FICO:

$34.47

PS Ratio

TLN:

5.27

FICO:

11.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

TLN:

$3.02B

FICO:

$2.39B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TLN:

$1.06B

FICO:

$2.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

TLN:

$326.00M

FICO:

$1.25B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLN vs. FICO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TLN
TLN Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
TLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLN Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
TLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLN Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

FICO
FICO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FICO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FICO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FICO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FICO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FICO Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TLN vs. FICO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Talen Energy Corporation (TLN) and Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLNFICODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.96

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.36

-0.43

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.68

-0.81

+0.13

TLN vs. FICO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLN Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is higher than the FICO Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLN and FICO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLN vs. FICO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLN drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, smaller than the maximum FICO drawdown of -79.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLN and FICO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLNFICODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.80%

-79.26%

+45.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.05%

-50.93%

+18.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.06%

-52.86%

+27.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.01%

-18.15%

+7.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.88%

27.05%

-10.17%

Volatility

TLN vs. FICO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Talen Energy Corporation (TLN) is 16.36%, while Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) has a volatility of 22.66%. This indicates that TLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FICO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLNFICODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.36%

22.66%

-6.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.74%

44.32%

-3.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.11%

53.50%

-0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.96%

41.84%

+18.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.96%

38.52%

+21.44%

Dividends

TLN vs. FICO - Dividend Comparison

Neither TLN nor FICO has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FICO
Fair Isaac Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.07%0.08%
TLN
Talen Energy Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TLN vs. FICO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Talen Energy Corporation and Fair Isaac Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

TLN vs. FICO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Talen Energy Corporation and Fair Isaac Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

TLN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Talen Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FICO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a gross profit of 587.17M and revenue of 674.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.1%.

TLN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Talen Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 210.00M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.

FICO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported an operating income of 362.63M and revenue of 674.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.8%.

TLN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Talen Energy Corporation reported a net income of 63.00M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.

FICO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a net income of 237.17M and revenue of 674.19M, resulting in a net margin of 35.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TLN and FICO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FICO has higher volatility (22.66%) compared to TLN (16.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLN dropped -33.80% vs FICO's -79.26%.

TLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.22 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLN and FICO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer