TLH vs. BLV
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV).
TLH and BLV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TLH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. 10-20 Year Treasury Bond Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2007. BLV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007. Both TLH and BLV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TLH or BLV.
Key characteristics
| TLH | BLV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -6.47% | -6.46% |
| 1Y Return | -9.33% | -6.09% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -8.61% | -8.09% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -3.35% | -1.42% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -0.10% | 1.54% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.65 | -0.42 |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.53% | 13.81% |
| Max Drawdown | -41.14% | -38.29% |
| Current Drawdown | -35.31% | -31.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLH and BLV is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
TLH vs. BLV - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TLH having a -6.47% return and BLV slightly higher at -6.46%. Over the past 10 years, TLH has underperformed BLV with an annualized return of -0.10%, while BLV has yielded a comparatively higher 1.54% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TLH vs. BLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLH has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BLV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TLH vs. BLV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TLH vs. BLV - Dividend Comparison
TLH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, less than BLV's 4.54% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLH iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.22% | 3.83% | 2.78% | 1.50% | 2.65% | 2.31% | 2.17% | 1.83% | 1.91% | 2.13% | 2.12% | 2.41% |
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | 4.54% | 4.06% | 4.17% | 3.37% | 5.84% | 3.57% | 4.07% | 3.63% | 4.16% | 4.37% | 3.90% | 4.85% |
Drawdowns
TLH vs. BLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLH drawdown since its inception was -41.14%, which is greater than BLV's maximum drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLH and BLV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TLH vs. BLV - Volatility Comparison
iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) have volatilities of 3.61% and 3.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.