TKC vs. BATT
TKC (Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.) is a stock, while BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) is Lithium & Battery Metals fund actively managed by Amplify. Over the past 5 years, TKC returned 6.59%/yr vs -2.05%/yr for BATT. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TKC vs. BATT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TKC achieves a -1.65% return, which is significantly lower than BATT's 3.91% return.
TKC
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -7.88%
- 6M
- -19.22%
- YTD
- -1.65%
- 1Y
- -1.95%
- 3Y*
- 7.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- 0.18%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.04%
BATT
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -5.22%
- 6M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- 3.91%
- 1Y
- 49.49%
- 3Y*
- 3.98%
- 5Y*
- -2.05%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -1.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $677.09K | $717.59K | $1.32M | |
| $20.28M | $15.23M | $12.15M |
TKC vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TKC Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. | -1.65% | -12.66% | 39.58% | 2.46% | 38.18% | -28.03% | -4.86% | 7.00% | -4.86% |
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 3.91% | 59.70% | -13.93% | -7.05% | -32.25% | 16.52% | 44.43% | -2.40% | -42.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between TKC and BATT is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2018 | 0.22 |
The correlation between TKC and BATT shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (5 years) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TKC vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank
TKC
BATT
TKC vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. (TKC) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TKC | BATT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.25 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 2.13 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | 6.06 | -6.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TKC vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TKC drawdown since its inception was -92.97%, which is greater than BATT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TKC and BATT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TKC | BATT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.97% | -69.38% | -23.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.76% | -23.02% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.32% | -46.15% | +15.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.59% | -61.98% | +11.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.67% | -20.47% | -42.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.72% | -34.40% | -22.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.09% | 8.08% | +3.01% |
Volatility
TKC vs. BATT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. (TKC) is 8.02%, while Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) has a volatility of 10.06%. This indicates that TKC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TKC | BATT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.02% | 10.06% | -2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.03% | 28.05% | -8.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.02% | 33.66% | -5.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.28% | 30.00% | +8.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.20% | 30.78% | +6.42% |
Dividends
TKC vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison
TKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than BATT's 1.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 1.78% | 1.85% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 4.14% | 2.32% | 0.21% | 3.22% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TKC Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. | 1.97% | 4.03% | 3.14% | 1.98% | 1.72% | 9.59% | 2.19% | 3.48% | 8.57% | 10.52% | 0.00% | 16.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TKC and BATT have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BATT has higher volatility (10.06%) compared to TKC (8.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TKC dropped -92.97% vs BATT's -69.38%.
BATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TKC and BATT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer