TKC vs. BATT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. (TKC) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT).

BATT is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Jun 6, 2018.

Performance

TKC vs. BATT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. (TKC) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TKC vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TKC Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.	10.24%	-12.66%	39.58%	2.46%	38.18%	-28.03%	-4.86%	7.00%	-5.59%
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	7.90%	59.70%	-13.93%	-7.05%	-32.25%	16.52%	44.43%	-2.40%	-42.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TKC achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly higher than BATT's 7.90% return.

TKC

• 1D: 2.03%
• 1M: -10.53%
• YTD: 10.24%
• 6M: 2.05%
• 1Y: 0.77%
• 3Y*: 15.33%
• 5Y*: 9.21%
• 10Y*: -0.61%

BATT

• 1D: 4.20%
• 1M: -8.43%
• YTD: 7.90%
• 6M: 16.74%
• 1Y: 81.61%
• 3Y*: 7.85%
• 5Y*: 1.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TKC vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TKC

TKC Risk / Return Rank: 40
TKC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
TKC Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
TKC Omega Ratio Rank: 35
TKC Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
TKC Martin Ratio Rank: 43

BATT

BATT Risk / Return Rank: 95
BATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
BATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
BATT Omega Ratio Rank: 93
BATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BATT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TKC vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. (TKC) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TKC	BATT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.03	2.54	-2.52
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.25	2.97	-2.72
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.41	-0.38
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.04	4.31	-4.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.09	16.05	-15.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TKC vs. BATT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TKC Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the BATT Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TKC and BATT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TKC	BATT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03	2.54	-2.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	0.07	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.03	-0.05	+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between TKC and BATT is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TKC vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison

TKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than BATT's 1.72% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TKC Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.	3.65%	4.03%	3.14%	1.98%	1.72%	9.59%	2.19%	3.48%	8.57%	10.52%	0.00%	16.91%
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	1.72%	1.85%	3.17%	3.23%	4.14%	2.32%	0.21%	3.22%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TKC vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TKC drawdown since its inception was -92.94%, which is greater than BATT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TKC and BATT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TKC	BATT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.94%	-69.38%	-23.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.34%	-18.00%	+0.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.59%	-61.98%	+11.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.16%	-16.31%	-41.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.67%	-35.41%	-21.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.14%	4.83%	+3.31%

Volatility

TKC vs. BATT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. (TKC) is 7.66%, while Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) has a volatility of 14.03%. This indicates that TKC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TKC	BATT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.66%	14.03%	-6.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.73%	25.15%	-5.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.61%	32.37%	-2.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.92%	29.25%	+8.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.37%	30.55%	+6.82%