TKC vs. BATT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TKC (Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.) is a stock, while BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) is Lithium & Battery Metals fund actively managed by Amplify. Over the past 5 years, TKC returned 8.25%/yr vs 2.12%/yr for BATT. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TKC vs. BATT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. (TKC) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TKC achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly lower than BATT's 20.36% return.

TKC

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 4.12%
• YTD: 10.97%
• 6M: 5.89%
• 1Y: 9.54%
• 3Y*: 22.41%
• 5Y*: 8.25%
• 10Y*: 1.07%

BATT

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -0.60%
• YTD: 20.36%
• 6M: 19.88%
• 1Y: 93.32%
• 3Y*: 12.58%
• 5Y*: 2.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TKC vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TKC Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.	10.97%	-12.66%	39.58%	2.46%	38.18%	-28.03%	-4.86%	7.00%	-4.86%
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	20.36%	59.70%	-13.93%	-7.05%	-32.25%	16.52%	44.43%	-2.40%	-42.27%

Correlation

The correlation between TKC and BATT is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2018	0.22

Return for Risk

TKC vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TKC

TKC Risk / Return Rank: 51
TKC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
TKC Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
TKC Omega Ratio Rank: 46
TKC Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
TKC Martin Ratio Rank: 53

BATT

BATT Risk / Return Rank: 85
BATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
BATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
BATT Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
BATT Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TKC vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. (TKC) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TKC	BATT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.33	2.91	-2.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.66	3.25	-2.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.44	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.46	5.51	-5.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.00	18.21	-17.21

TKC vs. BATT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TKC Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the BATT Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TKC and BATT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TKC vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TKC drawdown since its inception was -92.97%, which is greater than BATT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TKC and BATT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TKC	BATT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.97%	-69.38%	-23.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.70%	-17.03%	-3.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.32%	-47.65%	+17.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.59%	-61.98%	+11.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.89%	-7.88%	-50.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.71%	-34.62%	-22.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.53%	5.14%	+4.39%

Volatility

TKC vs. BATT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. (TKC) is 9.00%, while Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) has a volatility of 11.78%. This indicates that TKC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TKC	BATT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.00%	11.78%	-2.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.53%	26.63%	-6.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.11%	32.33%	-3.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.21%	29.90%	+8.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.33%	30.72%	+6.61%

Dividends

TKC vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison

TKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than BATT's 1.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	1.54%	1.85%	3.17%	3.23%	4.14%	2.32%	0.21%	3.22%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TKC Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.	3.63%	4.03%	3.14%	1.98%	1.72%	9.59%	2.19%	3.48%	8.57%	10.52%	0.00%	16.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TKC and BATT in my portfolio?

TKC and BATT have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TKC or BATT?

BATT has higher volatility (11.78%) compared to TKC (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TKC dropped -92.97% vs BATT's -69.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.