PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TISPX vs. PJFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TISPX vs. PJFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF S&P 500 Index Fund (TISPX) and PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TISPX achieves a 10.87% return, which is significantly higher than PJFAX's 7.82% return. Over the past 10 years, TISPX has underperformed PJFAX with an annualized return of 15.31%, while PJFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.13% annualized return.


TISPX

1D
-0.73%
1M
4.18%
YTD
10.87%
6M
10.75%
1Y
27.92%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
13.86%
10Y*
15.31%

PJFAX

1D
-1.29%
1M
6.04%
YTD
7.82%
6M
6.49%
1Y
19.18%
3Y*
28.71%
5Y*
14.67%
10Y*
20.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TISPX vs. PJFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TISPX
TIAA-CREF S&P 500 Index Fund
10.87%17.79%24.94%26.22%-18.13%28.66%18.34%31.44%-4.52%19.58%
PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
7.82%14.53%48.10%52.76%-37.89%15.65%55.66%45.04%-1.24%36.41%

Correlation

The correlation between TISPX and PJFAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2002

0.90

The correlation between TISPX and PJFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TISPX vs. PJFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TISPX
TISPX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
TISPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TISPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TISPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
TISPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TISPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PJFAX
PJFAX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
PJFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PJFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TISPX vs. PJFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF S&P 500 Index Fund (TISPX) and PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TISPXPJFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.22

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

1.12

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.76

3.56

+11.20

TISPX vs. PJFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TISPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the PJFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TISPX and PJFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TISPXPJFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

1.22

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.60

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.84

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.51

+0.11

Drawdowns

TISPX vs. PJFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TISPX drawdown since its inception was -55.16%, smaller than the maximum PJFAX drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TISPX and PJFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TISPXPJFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.16%

-64.07%

+8.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-17.76%

+8.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.74%

-24.05%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.48%

-43.56%

+19.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.75%

-43.56%

+9.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-1.92%

+1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-20.35%

+13.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

5.55%

-3.65%

Volatility

TISPX vs. PJFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF S&P 500 Index Fund (TISPX) is 2.92%, while PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) has a volatility of 4.17%. This indicates that TISPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PJFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TISPXPJFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

4.17%

-1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.01%

12.40%

-3.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

16.31%

-4.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.89%

24.69%

-7.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.07%

24.01%

-5.94%

TISPX vs. PJFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TISPX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PJFAX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

TISPX vs. PJFAX - Dividend Comparison

TISPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than PJFAX's 12.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
12.44%13.42%24.62%7.23%2.77%14.67%9.02%16.27%6.06%5.85%4.12%6.90%
TISPX
TIAA-CREF S&P 500 Index Fund
2.12%2.35%1.52%1.48%1.91%1.77%1.53%2.16%2.94%0.36%2.39%0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, TISPX and PJFAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PJFAX has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to TISPX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TISPX dropped -55.16% vs PJFAX's -64.07%.

TISPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TISPX and PJFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer