PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIREX vs. CSRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIREX vs. CSRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Real Estate Securities Fund Institutional Class (TIREX) and Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares (CSRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIREX achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than CSRIX's 11.17% return. Over the past 10 years, TIREX has underperformed CSRIX with an annualized return of 6.42%, while CSRIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.25% annualized return.


TIREX

1D
-1.88%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
8.91%
6M
7.77%
1Y
10.13%
3Y*
9.15%
5Y*
1.46%
10Y*
6.42%

CSRIX

1D
-1.78%
1M
-1.91%
YTD
11.17%
6M
10.24%
1Y
10.34%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*
7.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIREX vs. CSRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIREX
TIAA-CREF Real Estate Securities Fund Institutional Class
8.91%2.10%5.30%12.16%-28.74%39.39%1.29%31.09%-4.06%11.73%
CSRIX
Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares
11.17%3.10%6.26%12.75%-25.15%42.40%-2.55%36.11%-4.68%6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between TIREX and CSRIX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.98

The correlation between TIREX and CSRIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIREX vs. CSRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIREX
TIREX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TIREX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIREX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIREX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
TIREX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIREX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

CSRIX
CSRIX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
CSRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
CSRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIREX vs. CSRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Real Estate Securities Fund Institutional Class (TIREX) and Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares (CSRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TIREXCSRIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.80

0.79

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.15

1.13

+0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.14

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

1.51

-0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.56

4.02

+0.54

TIREX vs. CSRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIREX Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the CSRIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIREX and CSRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TIREXCSRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

0.79

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.20

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.36

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.35

-0.02

Drawdowns

TIREX vs. CSRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIREX drawdown since its inception was -74.18%, which is greater than CSRIX's maximum drawdown of -41.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIREX and CSRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIREXCSRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.18%

-41.45%

-32.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-7.74%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.95%

-16.89%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.67%

-31.79%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.26%

-41.45%

+2.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.41%

-3.27%

-3.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.49%

-8.80%

-4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

2.92%

-0.44%

Volatility

TIREX vs. CSRIX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Real Estate Securities Fund Institutional Class (TIREX) and Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares (CSRIX) have volatilities of 3.67% and 3.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIREXCSRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

3.68%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.57%

10.14%

-0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.96%

13.47%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.83%

18.59%

+0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.14%

20.49%

-0.35%

TIREX vs. CSRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIREX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than CSRIX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIREX vs. CSRIX - Dividend Comparison

TIREX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than CSRIX's 2.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSRIX
Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares
2.88%3.14%2.97%3.04%4.28%3.87%4.91%12.97%5.45%6.28%12.61%13.63%
TIREX
TIAA-CREF Real Estate Securities Fund Institutional Class
2.53%3.56%3.08%2.71%5.13%3.07%1.80%6.18%3.54%7.20%4.16%5.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, TIREX and CSRIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CSRIX has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to TIREX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIREX dropped -74.18% vs CSRIX's -41.45%.

TIREX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIREX and CSRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer