PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIPZ vs. BSV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIPZ vs. BSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF (TIPZ) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIPZ achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly higher than BSV's 0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, TIPZ has outperformed BSV with an annualized return of 2.37%, while BSV has yielded a comparatively lower 1.91% annualized return.


TIPZ

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
1.90%
6M
0.95%
1Y
3.58%
3Y*
3.45%
5Y*
0.62%
10Y*
2.37%

BSV

1D
0.10%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.51%
1Y
3.18%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
1.68%
10Y*
1.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIPZ vs. BSV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIPZ
PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF
1.90%5.87%1.52%3.37%-12.67%5.48%10.98%8.64%-1.65%3.12%
BSV
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares
0.32%6.00%3.78%4.90%-5.49%-1.09%4.70%4.98%1.34%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between TIPZ and BSV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2009

0.63

The correlation between TIPZ and BSV shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.81 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIPZ vs. BSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIPZ
TIPZ Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
TIPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
TIPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

BSV
BSV Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
BSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSV Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSV Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIPZ vs. BSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF (TIPZ) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIPZBSVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.33

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

2.48

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.08

8.14

-3.07

TIPZ vs. BSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIPZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the BSV Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIPZ and BSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIPZ vs. BSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIPZ drawdown since its inception was -15.77%, which is greater than BSV's maximum drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPZ and BSV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIPZBSVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.77%

-8.54%

-7.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.18%

-1.29%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.74%

-1.53%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.77%

-8.54%

-7.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.77%

-8.54%

-7.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.09%

-0.60%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.32%

-0.97%

-3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

0.39%

+0.32%

Volatility

TIPZ vs. BSV - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF (TIPZ) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) at 0.60%. This indicates that TIPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIPZBSVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

0.60%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.00%

1.33%

+1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.90%

1.82%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.35%

2.73%

+3.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.85%

2.38%

+3.47%

TIPZ vs. BSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIPZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BSV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TIPZ vs. BSV - Dividend Comparison

TIPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, more than BSV's 3.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSV
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares
3.99%3.83%3.38%2.46%1.50%1.45%1.79%2.29%1.99%1.65%1.48%1.40%
TIPZ
PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF
5.14%4.74%4.44%4.69%7.14%4.41%1.47%1.65%2.23%1.70%1.06%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIPZ and BSV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIPZ has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to BSV (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIPZ dropped -15.77% vs BSV's -8.54%.

On 10-year performance, TIPZ leads with 2.37% vs 1.91% for BSV. On fees, BSV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BSV has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TIPZ has performed better with a 2.37% return vs 1.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TIPZ.

TIPZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.14%, compared with 3.99% for BSV.

TIPZ is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while BSV is Short-Term Bond. TIPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury, while BSV tracks Bloomberg U.S. 1–5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TIPZ and 0.03% for BSV.

BSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIPZ and BSV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer