TILT vs. FDGRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TILT (FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund) and FDGRX (Fidelity Growth Company Fund) are both funds - TILT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index, while FDGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. TILT is passively managed, while FDGRX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, TILT returned 13.96%/yr vs 23.01%/yr for FDGRX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TILT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for FDGRX.

Performance

TILT vs. FDGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TILT achieves a 10.68% return, which is significantly lower than FDGRX's 23.73% return. Over the past 10 years, TILT has underperformed FDGRX with an annualized return of 13.96%, while FDGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.01% annualized return.

TILT

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 4.39%
• YTD: 10.68%
• 6M: 10.81%
• 1Y: 28.46%
• 3Y*: 20.80%
• 5Y*: 11.59%
• 10Y*: 13.96%

FDGRX

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 8.79%
• YTD: 23.73%
• 6M: 19.90%
• 1Y: 48.48%
• 3Y*: 31.67%
• 5Y*: 17.53%
• 10Y*: 23.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TILT vs. FDGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TILT FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund	10.68%	16.59%	19.88%	24.70%	-17.25%	27.61%	16.05%	29.01%	-8.93%	18.33%
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund	23.73%	18.54%	37.18%	47.25%	-33.86%	22.57%	67.42%	38.40%	-4.14%	36.76%

Correlation

The correlation between TILT and FDGRX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2011	0.82

The correlation between TILT and FDGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

TILT vs. FDGRX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TILT	FDGRX
Technology	27.2%	52.2%
Financial Services	16.0%	3.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.9%	11.7%
Industrials	10.1%	2.6%
Healthcare	9.4%	12.4%
Communication Services	8.6%	13.5%
Energy	4.8%	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	2.9%
Real Estate	3.1%	0.2%
Basic Materials	2.7%	0.7%
Utilities	2.4%	-

Return for Risk

TILT vs. FDGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILT

TILT Risk / Return Rank: 71
TILT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
TILT Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
TILT Omega Ratio Rank: 70
TILT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
TILT Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FDGRX

FDGRX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FDGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FDGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FDGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FDGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FDGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILT vs. FDGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TILT	FDGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	2.74	-0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	3.35	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.46	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.36	4.00	-0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.71	15.03	-0.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TILT vs. FDGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILT Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the FDGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILT and FDGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TILT	FDGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	2.74	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.74	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75	0.99	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.70	+0.14

Drawdowns

TILT vs. FDGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILT drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, smaller than the maximum FDGRX drawdown of -71.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILT and FDGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TILT	FDGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.46%	-71.62%	+33.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.51%	-12.60%	+4.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.85%	-26.19%	+6.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.12%	-40.25%	+16.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.46%	-40.25%	+1.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	0.00%	-0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.23%	-15.91%	+11.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.94%	3.34%	-1.40%

Volatility

TILT vs. FDGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT) is 3.04%, while Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that TILT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TILT	FDGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.04%	4.40%	-1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.95%	14.41%	-5.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.29%	18.44%	-6.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.39%	23.93%	-6.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.75%	23.39%	-4.64%

TILT vs. FDGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TILT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FDGRX's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

TILT vs. FDGRX - Dividend Comparison

TILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, while FDGRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund	0.00%	0.00%	8.86%	3.83%	7.20%	10.67%	8.86%	3.84%	6.38%	4.73%	6.16%	3.92%
TILT FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund	1.07%	1.15%	1.23%	1.44%	1.60%	1.16%	1.49%	1.54%	1.97%	1.55%	1.60%	1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TILT and FDGRX in my portfolio?

TILT and FDGRX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TILT or FDGRX?

FDGRX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to TILT (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILT dropped -38.46% vs FDGRX's -71.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.