TILGX vs. TIBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) and TIAA-CREF Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class (TIBFX).
TILGX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Mar 31, 2006. TIBFX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Mar 31, 2006.
Performance
TILGX vs. TIBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TILGX vs. TIBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TILGX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class | -8.83% | 15.25% | 29.23% | 47.05% | -32.76% | 16.84% | 44.23% | 30.76% | -0.38% | 33.89% |
TIBFX TIAA-CREF Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class | -0.42% | 7.36% | 2.34% | 6.66% | -13.84% | -0.32% | 8.22% | 9.71% | -0.53% | 4.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TILGX achieves a -8.83% return, which is significantly lower than TIBFX's -0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, TILGX has outperformed TIBFX with an annualized return of 14.95%, while TIBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.33% annualized return.
TILGX
- 1D
- 3.55%
- 1M
- -5.15%
- YTD
- -8.83%
- 6M
- -8.00%
- 1Y
- 17.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.48%
- 5Y*
- 8.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.95%
TIBFX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- -0.42%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 0.48%
- 10Y*
- 2.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TILGX vs. TIBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TILGX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TIBFX's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TILGX vs. TIBFX — Risk / Return Rank
TILGX
TIBFX
TILGX vs. TIBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) and TIAA-CREF Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class (TIBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TILGX | TIBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 1.04 | -0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 1.49 | -0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.18 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 1.73 | -0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.43 | 5.66 | -2.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TILGX | TIBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 1.04 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.09 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.51 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.84 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between TILGX and TIBFX is -0.10. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
TILGX vs. TIBFX - Dividend Comparison
TILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.22%, more than TIBFX's 4.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TILGX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class | 15.22% | 13.87% | 6.41% | 0.22% | 0.42% | 10.49% | 37.04% | 4.41% | 14.12% | 3.83% | 1.82% | 3.80% |
TIBFX TIAA-CREF Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class | 4.24% | 4.55% | 3.87% | 3.84% | 2.85% | 3.76% | 3.71% | 3.24% | 3.08% | 3.16% | 4.14% | 3.95% |
Drawdowns
TILGX vs. TIBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TILGX drawdown since its inception was -52.16%, which is greater than TIBFX's maximum drawdown of -18.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILGX and TIBFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TILGX | TIBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.16% | -18.92% | -33.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.19% | -2.98% | -12.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.86% | -18.92% | -18.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.86% | -18.92% | -18.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.17% | -2.23% | -9.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.90% | -2.63% | -6.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.44% | 0.91% | +3.53% |
Volatility
TILGX vs. TIBFX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) has a higher volatility of 6.44% compared to TIAA-CREF Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class (TIBFX) at 1.40%. This indicates that TILGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TILGX | TIBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | 1.40% | +5.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.66% | 2.37% | +10.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.33% | 4.00% | +18.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 5.38% | +16.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.59% | 4.55% | +17.04% |