TILGX vs. RGAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX).
TILGX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Mar 31, 2006. RGAGX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Dec 1, 1973.
Performance
TILGX vs. RGAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TILGX vs. RGAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TILGX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class | -8.83% | 15.25% | 29.23% | 47.05% | -32.76% | 16.84% | 44.23% | 30.76% | -0.38% | 33.89% |
RGAGX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 | -7.99% | 20.08% | 28.41% | 37.66% | -30.53% | 19.67% | 38.30% | 29.22% | -2.88% | 26.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TILGX achieves a -8.83% return, which is significantly lower than RGAGX's -7.99% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TILGX having a 14.95% annualized return and RGAGX not far behind at 14.74%.
TILGX
- 1D
- 3.55%
- 1M
- -5.15%
- YTD
- -8.83%
- 6M
- -8.00%
- 1Y
- 17.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.48%
- 5Y*
- 8.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.95%
RGAGX
- 1D
- 3.55%
- 1M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- -7.99%
- 6M
- -7.03%
- 1Y
- 17.19%
- 3Y*
- 20.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 14.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TILGX vs. RGAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TILGX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than RGAGX's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TILGX vs. RGAGX — Risk / Return Rank
TILGX
RGAGX
TILGX vs. RGAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TILGX | RGAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 0.86 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 1.37 | -0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.20 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 1.29 | -0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.43 | 4.90 | -1.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TILGX | RGAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 0.86 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.46 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.75 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.80 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between TILGX and RGAGX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TILGX vs. RGAGX - Dividend Comparison
TILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.22%, more than RGAGX's 11.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TILGX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class | 15.22% | 13.87% | 6.41% | 0.22% | 0.42% | 10.49% | 37.04% | 4.41% | 14.12% | 3.83% | 1.82% | 3.80% |
RGAGX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 | 11.95% | 10.99% | 9.29% | 7.70% | 4.44% | 8.49% | 4.57% | 7.93% | 12.36% | 7.34% | 6.95% | 9.22% |
Drawdowns
TILGX vs. RGAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TILGX drawdown since its inception was -52.16%, which is greater than RGAGX's maximum drawdown of -36.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILGX and RGAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TILGX | RGAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.16% | -36.19% | -15.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.19% | -13.71% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.86% | -36.19% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.86% | -36.19% | -1.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.17% | -10.64% | -1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.90% | -5.53% | -3.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.44% | 3.62% | +0.82% |
Volatility
TILGX vs. RGAGX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) have volatilities of 6.44% and 6.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TILGX | RGAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | 6.74% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.66% | 12.12% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.33% | 21.00% | +1.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 20.23% | +1.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.59% | 19.64% | +1.95% |