TILGX vs. RGAGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TILGX (TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class) and RGAGX (American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TILGX returned 16.62%/yr vs 16.30%/yr for RGAGX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TILGX charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RGAGX.

Performance

TILGX vs. RGAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TILGX achieves a 6.94% return, which is significantly lower than RGAGX's 9.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TILGX having a 16.62% annualized return and RGAGX not far behind at 16.30%.

TILGX

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 3.77%
• YTD: 6.94%
• 6M: 6.10%
• 1Y: 22.48%
• 3Y*: 22.47%
• 5Y*: 11.13%
• 10Y*: 16.62%

RGAGX

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 5.24%
• YTD: 9.36%
• 6M: 8.89%
• 1Y: 25.11%
• 3Y*: 25.20%
• 5Y*: 12.43%
• 10Y*: 16.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TILGX vs. RGAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TILGX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class	6.94%	15.25%	29.23%	47.05%	-32.76%	16.84%	44.23%	30.76%	-0.38%	33.89%
RGAGX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6	9.36%	20.08%	28.41%	37.66%	-30.53%	19.67%	38.30%	29.22%	-2.88%	26.53%

Correlation

The correlation between TILGX and RGAGX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2009	0.95

The correlation between TILGX and RGAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TILGX vs. RGAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILGX

TILGX Risk / Return Rank: 23
TILGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
TILGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
TILGX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
TILGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
TILGX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

RGAGX

RGAGX Risk / Return Rank: 31
RGAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
RGAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
RGAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
RGAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
RGAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILGX vs. RGAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TILGX	RGAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	1.69	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	2.34	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.30	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	1.87	-0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.12	7.32	-2.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TILGX vs. RGAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the RGAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILGX and RGAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TILGX	RGAGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.48	1.69	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.62	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	0.83	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.85	-0.29

Drawdowns

TILGX vs. RGAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILGX drawdown since its inception was -52.16%, which is greater than RGAGX's maximum drawdown of -36.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILGX and RGAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TILGX	RGAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.16%	-36.19%	-15.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.19%	-13.71%	-1.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.94%	-21.54%	-2.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.86%	-36.19%	-1.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.86%	-36.19%	-1.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.17%	-1.12%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.85%	-5.49%	-3.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.50%	3.50%	+1.00%

Volatility

TILGX vs. RGAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) is 3.34%, while American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that TILGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TILGX	RGAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.34%	3.86%	-0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.38%	11.66%	-0.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.59%	15.16%	+0.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.87%	20.24%	+1.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.61%	19.69%	+1.92%

TILGX vs. RGAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TILGX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than RGAGX's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

TILGX vs. RGAGX - Dividend Comparison

TILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.97%, more than RGAGX's 10.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RGAGX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6	10.05%	10.99%	9.29%	7.70%	4.44%	8.49%	4.57%	7.93%	12.36%	7.34%	6.95%	9.22%
TILGX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class	12.97%	13.87%	6.41%	0.22%	0.42%	10.49%	37.04%	4.41%	14.12%	3.83%	1.82%	3.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TILGX and RGAGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, TILGX and RGAGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TILGX or RGAGX?

RGAGX has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to TILGX (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILGX dropped -52.16% vs RGAGX's -36.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RGAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.