PortfoliosLab logo
TIEIX vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TIEIX and ^GSPC is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

TIEIX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Equity Index Fund (TIEIX) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TIEIX:

0.73

^GSPC:

0.64

Sortino Ratio

TIEIX:

1.13

^GSPC:

1.09

Omega Ratio

TIEIX:

1.17

^GSPC:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

TIEIX:

0.73

^GSPC:

0.72

Martin Ratio

TIEIX:

2.70

^GSPC:

2.74

Ulcer Index

TIEIX:

5.20%

^GSPC:

4.95%

Daily Std Dev

TIEIX:

18.00%

^GSPC:

19.62%

Max Drawdown

TIEIX:

-56.33%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

TIEIX:

-3.05%

^GSPC:

-3.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIEIX achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, TIEIX has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 11.71%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.87% annualized return.


TIEIX

YTD

1.49%

1M

13.07%

6M

1.25%

1Y

12.86%

5Y*

16.27%

10Y*

11.71%

^GSPC

YTD

1.30%

1M

12.79%

6M

1.49%

1Y

12.35%

5Y*

15.37%

10Y*

10.87%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TIEIX vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIEIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TIEIX is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TIEIX is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TIEIX is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TIEIX is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TIEIX is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TIEIX is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TIEIX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Equity Index Fund (TIEIX) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TIEIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIEIX and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

TIEIX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIEIX drawdown since its inception was -56.33%, roughly equal to the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIEIX and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

TIEIX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Equity Index Fund (TIEIX) and S&P 500 (^GSPC) have volatilities of 5.54% and 5.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...