TIBFX vs. TILGX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class (TIBFX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX).
TIBFX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Mar 31, 2006. TILGX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Mar 31, 2006.
Performance
TIBFX vs. TILGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TIBFX vs. TILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIBFX TIAA-CREF Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class | -0.75% | 7.36% | 2.34% | 6.66% | -13.84% | -0.32% | 8.22% | 9.71% | -0.53% | 4.83% |
TILGX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class | -11.95% | 15.25% | 29.23% | 47.05% | -32.76% | 16.84% | 44.23% | 30.76% | -0.38% | 33.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIBFX achieves a -0.75% return, which is significantly higher than TILGX's -11.95% return. Over the past 10 years, TIBFX has underperformed TILGX with an annualized return of 2.30%, while TILGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.55% annualized return.
TIBFX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- YTD
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 3.74%
- 3Y*
- 4.03%
- 5Y*
- 0.47%
- 10Y*
- 2.30%
TILGX
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -8.17%
- YTD
- -11.95%
- 6M
- -10.69%
- 1Y
- 14.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.08%
- 10Y*
- 14.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TIBFX vs. TILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIBFX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TILGX's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TIBFX vs. TILGX — Risk / Return Rank
TIBFX
TILGX
TIBFX vs. TILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class (TIBFX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TIBFX | TILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 0.65 | +0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.59 | 1.09 | +0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.15 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 0.70 | +0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.23 | 2.38 | +2.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TIBFX | TILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 0.65 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.37 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.68 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.52 | +0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between TIBFX and TILGX is -0.10. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
TIBFX vs. TILGX - Dividend Comparison
TIBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, less than TILGX's 15.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIBFX TIAA-CREF Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class | 4.26% | 4.55% | 3.87% | 3.84% | 2.85% | 3.76% | 3.71% | 3.24% | 3.08% | 3.16% | 4.14% | 3.95% |
TILGX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class | 15.76% | 13.87% | 6.41% | 0.22% | 0.42% | 10.49% | 37.04% | 4.41% | 14.12% | 3.83% | 1.82% | 3.80% |
Drawdowns
TIBFX vs. TILGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIBFX drawdown since its inception was -18.92%, smaller than the maximum TILGX drawdown of -52.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIBFX and TILGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIBFX | TILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.92% | -52.16% | +33.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.98% | -15.19% | +12.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.92% | -37.86% | +18.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.92% | -37.86% | +18.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.55% | -15.19% | +12.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.63% | -8.90% | +6.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 4.47% | -3.57% |
Volatility
TIBFX vs. TILGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class (TIBFX) is 1.37%, while TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that TIBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TILGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TIBFX | TILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | 5.15% | -3.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.35% | 12.16% | -9.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.00% | 22.10% | -18.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.38% | 21.90% | -16.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.55% | 21.56% | -17.01% |