PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIBFX vs. TILGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIBFX vs. TILGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class (TIBFX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIBFX achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than TILGX's 8.14% return. Over the past 10 years, TIBFX has underperformed TILGX with an annualized return of 2.30%, while TILGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.75% annualized return.


TIBFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.80%
6M
0.87%
1Y
6.07%
3Y*
4.79%
5Y*
0.54%
10Y*
2.30%

TILGX

1D
-0.06%
1M
5.43%
YTD
8.14%
6M
7.42%
1Y
24.29%
3Y*
22.92%
5Y*
11.71%
10Y*
16.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIBFX vs. TILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIBFX
TIAA-CREF Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class
0.80%7.36%2.34%6.66%-13.84%-0.32%8.22%9.71%-0.53%4.83%
TILGX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class
8.14%15.25%29.23%47.05%-32.76%16.84%44.23%30.76%-0.38%33.89%

Correlation

The correlation between TIBFX and TILGX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2006

-0.09

The correlation between TIBFX and TILGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIBFX vs. TILGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIBFX
TIBFX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TIBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
TIBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

TILGX
TILGX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
TILGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
TILGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIBFX vs. TILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class (TIBFX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TIBFXTILGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.65

1.62

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.54

2.21

+0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.29

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

1.66

+0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.81

5.60

+1.22

TIBFX vs. TILGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the TILGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIBFX and TILGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TIBFXTILGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.62

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.54

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.78

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.57

+0.27

Drawdowns

TIBFX vs. TILGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIBFX drawdown since its inception was -18.92%, smaller than the maximum TILGX drawdown of -52.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIBFX and TILGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIBFXTILGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.92%

-52.16%

+33.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.98%

-15.19%

+12.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.67%

-23.94%

+18.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.92%

-37.86%

+18.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.92%

-37.86%

+18.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-0.06%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.62%

-8.85%

+6.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

4.50%

-3.61%

Volatility

TIBFX vs. TILGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class (TIBFX) is 1.36%, while TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) has a volatility of 3.07%. This indicates that TIBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TILGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIBFXTILGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

3.07%

-1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.75%

11.33%

-8.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.72%

15.56%

-11.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.43%

21.87%

-16.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.57%

21.61%

-17.04%

TIBFX vs. TILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIBFX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TILGX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIBFX vs. TILGX - Dividend Comparison

TIBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, less than TILGX's 12.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TIBFX
TIAA-CREF Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class
4.71%4.55%3.87%3.84%2.85%3.76%3.71%3.24%3.08%3.16%4.14%3.95%
TILGX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class
12.83%13.87%6.41%0.22%0.42%10.49%37.04%4.41%14.12%3.83%1.82%3.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIBFX and TILGX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TILGX has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to TIBFX (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIBFX dropped -18.92% vs TILGX's -52.16%.

TIBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIBFX and TILGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer