PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THQ vs. UTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THQ vs. UTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund (THQ) and Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THQ achieves a 4.81% return, which is significantly lower than UTG's 8.27% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with THQ having a 9.22% annualized return and UTG not far ahead at 9.43%.


THQ

1D
-0.53%
1M
-0.31%
6M
3.77%
YTD
4.81%
1Y
30.09%
3Y*
10.44%
5Y*
3.90%
10Y*
9.22%
ALL TIME*
7.96%

UTG

1D
0.65%
1M
-2.98%
6M
4.86%
YTD
8.27%
1Y
7.03%
3Y*
19.80%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
9.43%
ALL TIME*
10.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.38M$4.74M$3.75M
$12.10M$10.96M$10.49M

THQ vs. UTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
THQ
Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund
4.81%13.88%15.51%-1.62%-17.53%33.39%15.20%22.70%3.41%21.84%
UTG
Reaves Utility Income Trust
8.27%23.24%28.10%2.84%-13.38%14.26%-5.25%33.65%1.84%6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between THQ and UTG is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2014

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between THQ and UTG has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THQ vs. UTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

THQ
THQ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
THQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
THQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
THQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
THQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

UTG
UTG Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
UTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

THQ vs. UTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund (THQ) and Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


THQUTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.08

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

0.54

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.95

1.16

+4.79

THQ vs. UTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the UTG Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THQ and UTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

THQ vs. UTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THQ drawdown since its inception was -39.35%, smaller than the maximum UTG drawdown of -67.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THQ and UTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THQUTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.35%

-67.77%

+28.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.74%

-12.51%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.86%

-14.95%

-10.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.20%

-26.54%

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.35%

-47.91%

+8.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-10.60%

+9.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-8.72%

+0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.90%

5.87%

-0.97%

Volatility

THQ vs. UTG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund (THQ) is 4.57%, while Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that THQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THQUTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

5.22%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.68%

14.11%

-0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.24%

18.00%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.22%

17.17%

+2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.53%

21.70%

-1.17%

Dividends

THQ vs. UTG - Dividend Comparison

THQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.53%, more than UTG's 6.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
THQ
Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund
11.53%11.29%11.09%7.45%6.81%5.27%6.62%7.08%8.05%7.71%8.70%9.50%
UTG
Reaves Utility Income Trust
6.27%6.42%7.19%8.53%8.07%6.35%6.59%5.69%6.86%6.21%9.02%6.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


THQ and UTG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTG has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to THQ (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THQ dropped -39.35% vs UTG's -67.77%.

THQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THQ and UTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer