PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THO vs. AZO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

THO vs. AZO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thor Industries, Inc. (THO) and AutoZone, Inc. (AZO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THO achieves a -21.40% return, which is significantly lower than AZO's -9.73% return. Over the past 10 years, THO has underperformed AZO with an annualized return of 4.19%, while AZO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.93% annualized return.


THO

1D
2.86%
1M
8.19%
YTD
-21.40%
6M
-19.11%
1Y
-1.05%
3Y*
1.18%
5Y*
-5.54%
10Y*
4.19%

AZO

1D
1.07%
1M
-12.08%
YTD
-9.73%
6M
-19.91%
1Y
-18.31%
3Y*
8.74%
5Y*
17.16%
10Y*
14.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THO vs. AZO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
THO
Thor Industries, Inc.
-21.40%9.74%-17.90%59.77%-25.57%13.26%27.97%46.47%-64.79%52.43%
AZO
AutoZone, Inc.
-9.73%5.92%23.84%4.84%17.64%76.84%-0.49%42.10%17.85%-9.93%

Correlation

The correlation between THO and AZO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 1991

0.24

The correlation between THO and AZO shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.24 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

THO:

$4.18B

AZO:

$51.59B

EPS

THO:

$4.93

AZO:

$145.27

PE Ratio

THO:

16.17

AZO:

21.08

PS Ratio

THO:

0.43

AZO:

2.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

THO:

$9.82B

AZO:

$19.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

THO:

$1.21B

AZO:

$10.34B

EBITDA (TTM)

THO:

$489.04M

AZO:

$4.26B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THO vs. AZO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THO
THO Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
THO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
THO Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
THO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
THO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

AZO
AZO Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AZO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZO Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
AZO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZO Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THO vs. AZO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thor Industries, Inc. (THO) and AutoZone, Inc. (AZO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THOAZODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

0.90

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

-0.56

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.06

-1.24

+1.19

THO vs. AZO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THO Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is higher than the AZO Sharpe Ratio of -0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THO and AZO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THOAZODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

-0.68

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

0.71

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

0.57

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.62

-0.29

Drawdowns

THO vs. AZO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THO drawdown since its inception was -79.55%, which is greater than AZO's maximum drawdown of -46.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THO and AZO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THOAZODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.55%

-46.32%

-33.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.66%

-32.59%

-7.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.40%

-32.59%

-15.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.40%

-32.59%

-15.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.94%

-42.14%

-34.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.73%

-29.69%

-12.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.14%

-10.87%

-13.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.07%

14.75%

+3.32%

Volatility

THO vs. AZO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thor Industries, Inc. (THO) is 9.74%, while AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) has a volatility of 11.45%. This indicates that THO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AZO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THOAZODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.74%

11.45%

-1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.24%

23.04%

+5.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.41%

27.09%

+10.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.78%

24.44%

+16.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.31%

26.47%

+17.84%

Dividends

THO vs. AZO - Dividend Comparison

THO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, while AZO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AZO
AutoZone, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
THO
Thor Industries, Inc.
2.58%1.97%1.53%1.57%2.33%1.62%1.74%2.13%2.92%0.93%1.26%2.03%

Financials

THO vs. AZO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Thor Industries, Inc. and AutoZone, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
2.78B
4.84B
(THO) Total Revenue
(AZO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

THO vs. AZO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Thor Industries, Inc. and AutoZone, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
12.8%
52.2%
Portfolio components
THO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thor Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 354.77M and revenue of 2.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.8%.

AZO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.52B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.

THO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thor Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 96.02M and revenue of 2.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.5%.

AZO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported an operating income of 923.76M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.1%.

THO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thor Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 95.54M and revenue of 2.78B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.

AZO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported a net income of 641.49M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


THO and AZO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AZO has higher volatility (11.45%) compared to THO (9.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THO dropped -79.55% vs AZO's -46.32%.

THO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.03 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THO and AZO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer