PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THNQ vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

THNQ vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

THNQ vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
THNQ
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
-6.16%29.83%18.82%56.81%-39.84%9.10%58.41%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
-5.76%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%62.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THNQ achieves a -6.16% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's -5.76% return.


THNQ

1D
0.96%
1M
-5.09%
YTD
-6.16%
6M
-8.83%
1Y
33.73%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*

NVDA

1D
0.77%
1M
-3.68%
YTD
-5.76%
6M
-6.13%
1Y
59.59%
3Y*
85.01%
5Y*
66.40%
10Y*
69.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THNQ vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THNQ
THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THNQ vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THNQNVDADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.11

1.45

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.67

2.14

-0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.27

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

3.08

-1.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.16

7.73

-1.56

THNQ vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THNQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THNQ and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THNQNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

1.45

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

1.29

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.61

-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between THNQ and NVDA is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

THNQ vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

THNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
THNQ
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
0.22%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Drawdowns

THNQ vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THNQ drawdown since its inception was -50.56%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THNQ and NVDA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


THNQNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.56%

-89.72%

+39.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.39%

-20.21%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.56%

-66.34%

+15.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.00%

-15.10%

+2.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.44%

-36.40%

+20.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.66%

8.05%

-2.39%

Volatility

THNQ vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) have volatilities of 10.64% and 10.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


THNQNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.64%

10.43%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.69%

25.79%

-5.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.42%

41.42%

-11.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.76%

51.72%

-22.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.57%

49.84%

-21.27%