THG vs. CB
THG (The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.) and CB (Chubb Limited) are both stocks. Both operate in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, THG returned 14.31%/yr vs 12.89%/yr for CB. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
THG vs. CB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THG achieves a 28.60% return, which is significantly higher than CB's 13.04% return. Over the past 10 years, THG has outperformed CB with an annualized return of 14.31%, while CB has yielded a comparatively lower 12.89% annualized return.
THG
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- 6M
- 34.97%
- YTD
- 28.60%
- 1Y
- 40.63%
- 3Y*
- 30.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.98%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.72%
CB
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -2.90%
- 6M
- 13.97%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- 32.82%
- 3Y*
- 21.57%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $775.34M | $719.59M | $600.51M | |
| $76.18M | $77.60M | $67.12M |
THG vs. CB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THG The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. | 28.60% | 20.66% | 30.61% | -7.61% | 5.40% | 14.51% | -12.31% | 26.73% | 10.15% | 21.41% |
CB Chubb Limited | 13.04% | 14.46% | 23.89% | 4.20% | 15.97% | 27.85% | 1.41% | 22.94% | -9.63% | 12.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between THG and CB is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 1995 | 0.53 |
The correlation between THG and CB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
THG:
$8.10B
CB:
$135.29B
THG:
$27.73
CB:
$35.80
THG:
8.39
CB:
9.80
THG:
0.03
CB:
0.68
THG:
0.94
CB:
3.94
THG:
$6.76B
CB:
$35.28B
THG:
$1.19B
CB:
$10.23B
THG:
$1.01B
CB:
$15.23B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THG vs. CB — Risk / Return Rank
THG
CB
THG vs. CB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. (THG) and Chubb Limited (CB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| THG | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.32 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.85 | 3.60 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.98 | 9.94 | -0.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
THG vs. CB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THG drawdown since its inception was -89.84%, which is greater than CB's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THG and CB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THG | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.84% | -50.99% | -38.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -9.36% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.98% | -14.35% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.35% | -19.26% | -11.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.10% | -42.59% | +2.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.53% | +3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.56% | -10.65% | -11.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.28% | 3.38% | +0.90% |
Volatility
THG vs. CB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. (THG) is 8.06%, while Chubb Limited (CB) has a volatility of 8.96%. This indicates that THG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THG | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.06% | 8.96% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.81% | 15.55% | +0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.04% | 19.27% | +1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.83% | 20.39% | +2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.21% | 23.81% | +0.40% |
Dividends
THG vs. CB - Dividend Comparison
THG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than CB's 1.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB Chubb Limited | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 1.91% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 2.07% | 4.23% |
THG The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. | 1.61% | 2.00% | 2.23% | 2.70% | 2.26% | 2.17% | 2.27% | 7.10% | 1.90% | 1.89% | 2.07% | 2.08% |
Financials
THG vs. CB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. and Chubb Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
THG vs. CB - Profitability Comparison
THG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of -743.80M and revenue of 1.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -43.1%.
CB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chubb Limited reported a gross profit of -6.85B and revenue of -10.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.3%.
THG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 141.10M and revenue of 1.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.
CB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chubb Limited reported an operating income of 14.07M and revenue of -10.99B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.1%.
THG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. reported a net income of 191.60M and revenue of 1.73B, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.
CB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chubb Limited reported a net income of 5.88B and revenue of -10.99B, resulting in a net margin of -53.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
THG and CB have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CB has higher volatility (8.96%) compared to THG (8.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THG dropped -89.84% vs CB's -50.99%.
THG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for THG and CB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer