PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THG vs. CB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

THG vs. CB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. (THG) and Chubb Limited (CB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THG achieves a 2.52% return, which is significantly higher than CB's 0.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with THG having a 11.15% annualized return and CB not far ahead at 11.41%.


THG

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.68%
YTD
2.52%
6M
4.64%
1Y
7.54%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*
11.15%

CB

1D
0.15%
1M
-3.80%
YTD
0.50%
6M
6.65%
1Y
6.88%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
14.29%
10Y*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THG vs. CB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
THG
The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.
2.52%20.66%30.61%-7.61%5.40%14.51%-12.31%26.73%10.15%21.41%
CB
Chubb Limited
0.50%14.46%23.89%4.20%15.97%27.85%1.41%22.94%-9.63%12.82%

Correlation

The correlation between THG and CB is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 1995

0.53

The correlation between THG and CB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

THG:

$26.44

CB:

$28.35

PE Ratio

THG:

7.05

CB:

11.03

PEG Ratio

THG:

0.03

CB:

0.77

PS Ratio

THG:

0.76

CB:

2.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

THG:

$6.68B

CB:

$48.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

THG:

$1.56B

CB:

$17.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

THG:

$716.20M

CB:

$12.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THG vs. CB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THG
THG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
THG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
THG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
THG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
THG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

CB
CB Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
CB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CB Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
CB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CB Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THG vs. CB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. (THG) and Chubb Limited (CB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THGCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.08

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

0.74

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.67

1.55

+0.13

THG vs. CB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THG Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is comparable to the CB Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THG and CB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THGCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

0.40

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.71

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.48

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.40

-0.11

Drawdowns

THG vs. CB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THG drawdown since its inception was -89.84%, which is greater than CB's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THG and CB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THGCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.84%

-50.99%

-38.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.02%

-9.36%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.98%

-14.35%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.35%

-19.26%

-11.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.10%

-42.59%

+2.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.66%

-8.49%

+2.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.67%

-10.68%

-11.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.71%

4.87%

-0.16%

Volatility

THG vs. CB - Volatility Comparison

The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. (THG) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Chubb Limited (CB) at 4.57%. This indicates that THG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THGCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

4.57%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.23%

12.54%

+1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.18%

17.33%

+2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.76%

20.28%

+2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.07%

23.65%

+0.42%

Dividends

THG vs. CB - Dividend Comparison

THG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than CB's 1.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CB
Chubb Limited
1.24%1.22%1.30%1.51%1.49%1.65%2.01%1.91%2.24%1.93%2.07%4.23%
THG
The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.
1.99%2.00%2.23%2.70%2.26%2.17%2.27%7.10%1.90%1.89%2.07%2.08%

Financials

THG vs. CB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. and Chubb Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
1.70B
1.88B
(THG) Total Revenue
(CB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


THG and CB have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THG has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to CB (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THG dropped -89.84% vs CB's -50.99%.

CB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THG and CB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer